Part 2

As we know, it did not happen this way, and the Bush administration had to make a quick decision--either a) go along, and doom the Palestinian people, b) expose the real perpetrators and for all intents and purposes spell the end of Israel as anything but a rogue state living on nuclear blackmail a la North Korea or c) sacrifice an intelligence asset in Osama bin Laden, someone few people would care to defend. The Bush/Saudi power bloc saw in this third way an opportunity to pursue their own regional agenda, and for their trouble earned the title of "most likely suspects" from the 9/11 truth movement that has from the beginning--especially at the beginning--been heavily populated by Zionist apologists who have long tried to dismiss speculation about the thermite/explosive destruction of Zionist Larry Silverstein's WTC as misguided or wrong, favoring the LIHOP theory whereby--you guessed it, Bush and the Saudis either allowed or assisted the hijackers to carry out the hijackings and crashes which 'naturally' led to the towers's 'collapse'. With demolition now accepted by most serious researchers, the tactic has shifted to, among others, promoting the ridiculous 'space beams dustified the steel' work by Judy Wood to muddy the waters by fielding an army of positive reviewers for her book so the public can be told or led to believe that her work is indeed representative of the demolition argument.

In the case of the anthrax mailings we find a familiar pattern--the accused, Bruce Ivins, suicided before a case could be presented in court, and some 'skeptics' intent on finding an Arab link when the clear suspect should instead be one Philip Zack--a former employee at Ft. Detrick who was guilty of harassing an Arab American colleague and who is known to have accessed the lab there after he was no longer authorized to. Just as Zack could easily have obtained the anthrax and transferred it to Israel, any number of disloyal employees of the U.S. military labs developing nano-thermite could have transferred that technology illicitly.

[But we also must bring to the picture the fact that this "Global War on Terror" was merely the Yinon war plan in disguise. Knowing this, it appears that likely all of these narratives were purposefully broadcasted and it need not matter where the proof may lie, as long as as many actors were blamed for this "Global War on Terror." In the end, those in control, could pick and choose who to go after and prevent, inhibit, or make deals with other power think tanks and elitists that might have dissimilar agendas. This is called ambiguity method in perception management. That is, to create as many contradicting narratives as possible or blame as many contradicting parties as possible.]

Hillary/obama/biden killing an Osama double then covering it up with bribes to Iran and killing seal team 6?

I don't know if Seal Team 6 was killed. Who knows, but this narrative was likely pre-written well in advance. Obama was not on the best terms with hardcore Likudniks. But when you read everything above, it would not be hard for them to fabricate this story. For they have the legal authority under the SMith Mundt Modernization ACt of 2012 to do just that.