Belarus

submitted by SoylentCapitalist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoylentCapitalist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

They actually were. He saw Slavs as inferior, so they were worked in labor camps and thousands exterminated.

Adolf Hitler, who regarded Jews and Slavs as subhuman, considered Ukraine and its people as resources to be exploited ruthlessly in the interests of German eastward expansion and world domination. His views were enthusiastically supported by top Nazi officials, notably Erich Koch, head of the Reichskommissariat Ukraine. Those officials overrode the objections of others, such as Alfred Rosenberg, head of the Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories, who favored the establishment of German dominance by means of concessions to the non-Russian Slavs. Nazi racial theory, the ideological basis for the criminal mistreatment of the Eastern European peoples, was openly expressed in such publications as the SS pamphlet Der Untermensch (1942).

http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CN%5CA%5CNaziwarcrimesinUkraine.htm

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Believing Slavs as inferior and the fact that slavs died during the war doesn't mean slavs were killed for being slavs. The only civilian killings that were tolerated were reprisals for partisan sabotage. Look at the images in Der Untermensch, they depicts asiastic people in the east not white slavs.

[–]SoylentCapitalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Slavic civilians were sent to concentration/labor camps because they were viewed as inferior. Where they proceeded to be systematically exterminated through starvation or execution, a similar treatment the Jews received. Being Slav was therefore one of the many prerequisites for such an unfortunate outcome.

[–]Ethnosomniator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

who is paying you to lie so brazenly? I've spoken to Slavic survivors of both Nazis and marxist/jew camps. Their verdict was clear.

[–]SoylentCapitalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Your anecdotes mean very little compared to the multiple sources I've cited supporting my claim.

[–]Ethnosomniator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You mean the sources you didn't even read?

The state of the left: "It's in here, I'm sure" It's quite an abysmal state of discourse and the reason more and more people don't trust the media who, like you, simply spread a gospel they deem the good news.

Is lying something you are proud of or is it just a tactical tool you use while holding your nose?

[–]SoylentCapitalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The quote I already linked saying you're wrong...

Adolf Hitler, who regarded Jews and Slavs as subhuman, considered Ukraine and its people as resources to be exploited ruthlessly in the interests of German eastward expansion and world domination. His views were enthusiastically supported by top Nazi officials, notably Erich Koch, head of the Reichskommissariat Ukraine. Those officials overrode the objections of others, such as Alfred Rosenberg, head of the Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories, who favored the establishment of German dominance by means of concessions to the non-Russian Slavs. Nazi racial theory, the ideological basis for the criminal mistreatment of the Eastern European peoples, was openly expressed in such publications as the SS pamphlet Der Untermensch (1942).

http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CN%5CA%5CNaziwarcrimesinUkraine.htm

Seriously, try to keep up.

[–]Ethnosomniator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's a propaganda blog presented with known propaganda fotos. This is not what's called a source, child. They immediately cite "der Untermensch" which, AGAIN, you didn't even bother to read. If you would, your brainwashed ideas about Nazi Germany might go away.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Ethnosomniator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    A primary source is an individual's account who personally dealt with the topic in question. Citing blogs sourcing the usual crap is not an argument, especially if these have been already debunked

    "Here, let me source three more blogs who all cite the "der Untermensch" without having read a single line"

    Seriously, why do you keep repeating the same false stuff over and over?