Genetic components to white guilt?

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Denmark is only 86% Danish now and perhaps 90% European overall. Its a tiny country and one socialist government can permanently destroy it in a week. All they have to do is allow 300k refugees in and the country is gone. Unfortunately the Danes have re-elected Social democrats and the nationalist parties are down in the dumps despite at one point, the Danish people's party being ranked #1 in the polls.

The Danish SD have already betrayed the voters on immigration

[–]ChancellorMershekel 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Danes are a good example of how people are often their own worst enemies. They have historically been some of the least conservative people in all of Europe; for example, they practically abolished all anti-porn laws as far back as (I think, and amusingly if so) 1969, setting a precedent that the rest of the world has to varying speeds followed. The party in power at that time even had a name like 'Social Radical Liberal' or some such nonsense that sets off alarm bells in my mind. How anyone—excluding those obvious degenerates whom benefit from such people being in power—could see any appeal in voting for a party with such a ridiculous name is beyond me.

Imagine being stupid enough to believe that a young woman who heads a literal 'Social Democratic' party is ever going to do anything about lowering immigration. Literally a few weeks (at the very most) after winning the election, there was already talk of bringing in more refugees. Meanwhile, the DPP, who actually seem much better regarding this particular problem, lost many votes... many of which likely went to the same SD that immediately backstabbed these utter fools. History repeats itself—more idiots elected, yet unlike the elections in the 1960s, there will not even be a chance to rectify these more recent mistakes.

The presence of such refugees is practically of no benefit to anyone but the refugees themselves. What exactly is so psychologically difficult for Whites to accept that the presence of such people is at best an unavoidable nuisance and at a worst an outright and very grave threat? It seems as though Whites like voting for people who govern for everyone but themselves. Because Whites do not seem to care if their governments favour others over themselves, governments only need to focus on appeasing such others to win elections. It ends up being like a feedback-loop (Whites don't care about their own interests and won't change their vote if they're neglected, all others do, therefore govern first and foremost in the interests of all others, which means bring in more others, which makes the problem more pronounced).

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm sorry if this comes off as misogynist but I simply can't trust female leaders. Not one, no matter how based they sound. They're absolutely enslaved to social affirmation and will do anything to get the pat on the head from the popular people. This Danish PM whore is no doubt like this, she says refugess welcome and gets a big dopamine rush from all the glowing comments she gets from the media and celebrities.

Only people with 1500ug/l testosterone should be allowed ot engage in politics

[–]ChancellorMershekel 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I certainly agree in the sense that if we change some attributes of a 'younger Social Democratic woman' (like the current Danish or Finnish Prime Ministers) to those of, say, an 'older Christian Democratic woman', you still end up with someone as damaging as Merkel. I don't even like Marine Le Pen that much, though she's leagues ahead of the aforementioned politicians.

In some ways, Merkel is even worse than the first two. For example, at least they don't actively try to convince people that they're aren't Leftists. Nor do they corrupt conservative parties—the German CDU literally now calls itself 'The Centre'; yep, it is no longer a party of the Right by its own admission. It is Merkel who is responsible for these changes. If Merkel was gone, the CDU could become a proper paleoconservative party, more like the 'far-right' (hah...) AfD, who were effectively the CDU of a few decades ago in terms of policies. Whereas if Marin or Frederiksen were gone, well, what would change given that they would only be succeeded by like-minded Social Democrats? It is borderline impossible for such parties to ever become paleocon, nationalistic or otherwise move anywhere near our position. Whereas at least centre-right party leaders like Wauquiez and Casado moved their parties closer to our position, even if it is just because of the rising popularity of RN and Vox in France and Spain respectively.

Of course, Le Pen's RN is also practically the French centre-right of the 90's anyway (as some have observed, Chirac's platform was highly similar to RN's current one). So it is not only Merkel and the CDU who are doing this, but also vermin like Sarkozy.