Genetic components to white guilt?

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

A lot of tought talk but I really don't see action on the ground. In Sweden muslims and africans beat up native boys and piss on them and the society does nothing. The problem with Western man and also East Asians for that matter, as a whole is over-civilization, its domestication syndrome. They've become too domesticated and civilized, they no longer retain that savage, barbarian nature to them.

The domesticated man is in thrall to rules and regulations and material comforts. They are afraid to break norms and afraid to take risks. If a pack of Africans went to a third world country and raped their women, they would not even bother with police, they'd just round the whole community up and kill them all.

Western man used to have this barbarian nature once, this violent vitality to them. Its reflected in conquistadors like Cortez and Pizzaro, the cossacks who settled Siberia, the Russians who vanquished the Mongols, the Vikings who pillaged the continents and yes, even the English, who invaded France with 1/5th the numbers and triumphed repeatedly.

A lack of darwinian selection, excess comfort and over-civilization has reduced him to a mule. If a group of young Swedish boys were thrown into the Amazon, where they would have to fight native tribes, predators and the heat, daily for survival, there wouldn't a trace of cuckery left within them after a few months

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    Denmark is only 86% Danish now and perhaps 90% European overall. Its a tiny country and one socialist government can permanently destroy it in a week. All they have to do is allow 300k refugees in and the country is gone. Unfortunately the Danes have re-elected Social democrats and the nationalist parties are down in the dumps despite at one point, the Danish people's party being ranked #1 in the polls.

    The Danish SD have already betrayed the voters on immigration

    [–]ChancellorMershekel 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Danes are a good example of how people are often their own worst enemies. They have historically been some of the least conservative people in all of Europe; for example, they practically abolished all anti-porn laws as far back as (I think, and amusingly if so) 1969, setting a precedent that the rest of the world has to varying speeds followed. The party in power at that time even had a name like 'Social Radical Liberal' or some such nonsense that sets off alarm bells in my mind. How anyone—excluding those obvious degenerates whom benefit from such people being in power—could see any appeal in voting for a party with such a ridiculous name is beyond me.

    Imagine being stupid enough to believe that a young woman who heads a literal 'Social Democratic' party is ever going to do anything about lowering immigration. Literally a few weeks (at the very most) after winning the election, there was already talk of bringing in more refugees. Meanwhile, the DPP, who actually seem much better regarding this particular problem, lost many votes... many of which likely went to the same SD that immediately backstabbed these utter fools. History repeats itself—more idiots elected, yet unlike the elections in the 1960s, there will not even be a chance to rectify these more recent mistakes.

    The presence of such refugees is practically of no benefit to anyone but the refugees themselves. What exactly is so psychologically difficult for Whites to accept that the presence of such people is at best an unavoidable nuisance and at a worst an outright and very grave threat? It seems as though Whites like voting for people who govern for everyone but themselves. Because Whites do not seem to care if their governments favour others over themselves, governments only need to focus on appeasing such others to win elections. It ends up being like a feedback-loop (Whites don't care about their own interests and won't change their vote if they're neglected, all others do, therefore govern first and foremost in the interests of all others, which means bring in more others, which makes the problem more pronounced).

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    I'm sorry if this comes off as misogynist but I simply can't trust female leaders. Not one, no matter how based they sound. They're absolutely enslaved to social affirmation and will do anything to get the pat on the head from the popular people. This Danish PM whore is no doubt like this, she says refugess welcome and gets a big dopamine rush from all the glowing comments she gets from the media and celebrities.

    Only people with 1500ug/l testosterone should be allowed ot engage in politics

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Dude this was was 1500 years ago. Genetics have changed and Christianity has eroded and corrupted the Aryan spirit over time.

      As for Nordic women being different from American women and all that...American women are Nordic for the most part. 60% of the White population in the US are descended from just three populations: English, German and Scottish. The first two are Germanic peoples and the latter is heavily intermixed with Vikings. North Germans are genetically identical to Danes and Englishmen are 40-60% German genetically. In the Eastern and Southern parts of England, the population is almost completely German genetically.

      So American women for the most part, are Nordic. America was founded as a Germanic nation.

      [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Dude this was was 1500 years ago

      Our women are still like that.

      As for Nordic women being different from American women and all that...American women are Nordic for the most part.

      American women are very different from Nordic women.

      [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkPJCWGnZNQ

      Swedes say what is "correct" to say but they don't actually mean it.

      [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Copium...what they do is what matters and they're pecked in like hens

      [–]ChancellorMershekel 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I certainly agree in the sense that if we change some attributes of a 'younger Social Democratic woman' (like the current Danish or Finnish Prime Ministers) to those of, say, an 'older Christian Democratic woman', you still end up with someone as damaging as Merkel. I don't even like Marine Le Pen that much, though she's leagues ahead of the aforementioned politicians.

      In some ways, Merkel is even worse than the first two. For example, at least they don't actively try to convince people that they're aren't Leftists. Nor do they corrupt conservative parties—the German CDU literally now calls itself 'The Centre'; yep, it is no longer a party of the Right by its own admission. It is Merkel who is responsible for these changes. If Merkel was gone, the CDU could become a proper paleoconservative party, more like the 'far-right' (hah...) AfD, who were effectively the CDU of a few decades ago in terms of policies. Whereas if Marin or Frederiksen were gone, well, what would change given that they would only be succeeded by like-minded Social Democrats? It is borderline impossible for such parties to ever become paleocon, nationalistic or otherwise move anywhere near our position. Whereas at least centre-right party leaders like Wauquiez and Casado moved their parties closer to our position, even if it is just because of the rising popularity of RN and Vox in France and Spain respectively.

      Of course, Le Pen's RN is also practically the French centre-right of the 90's anyway (as some have observed, Chirac's platform was highly similar to RN's current one). So it is not only Merkel and the CDU who are doing this, but also vermin like Sarkozy.