What an easy win that argument was.

Anyone who has a problem with a particular people existing as a distinct group indeed has a problem with the members of that group. If you didn't have a problem with them, you'd want them to thrive. And that includes them preserving their distinctness. There is no way you can say: "I have no problem with White people on an individual basis, I just oppose their group rights" without seeming to be a flagrant hypocrite.

This Left-liberal clown is using the typical argument that he (ostensibly) has no racial animus against Whites but obviously opposes (because of his radical individualism/deracialization) their group rights. It simply doesn't work that way. To remove the rights of a group is simply a step towards removing their individual rights. We rightly see this ludicrous insistence that we have only individual rights and no group rights as simply the stepping stone that non-Whites and other people manipulating White Left-liberals use to get closer to what they really want (i.e. an envy/hate-driven marginalization and effective mass murder of the 'privileged', a concept which has been racialized such that it has become synonymous with being of European descent).