"If we ever want to reclaim power, we must create truth that is discontinuous with humanitarianism."

submitted by DisgustResponse from threadreaderapp.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Yeah, and? It was racial discrimination to only hire specific demographics in the first place. You aren't being victimized, you're deliberately rejecting context because you think they should only hire white men.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Yeah, and? It was racial discrimination to only hire specific demographics in the first place.

That is ridiculous because it depends on the selection process used to hire employees. If I had a perfect algorithm for selecting employees based upon ability and every employee selected was a white man it would not be racially biased unless I purposely tuned the algorithm to disregard a qualified non-white candidate. Also, some jobs pick employees that are "team oriented". It makes it even more likely that the unbiased algorithm would pick the white employee because racial diversity causes division in the workplace.

You aren't being victimized, you're deliberately rejecting context because you think they should only hire white men.

White people don't want to be victims, we want independence and sovereignty over our societies again. There will be some non-white employees but there will be a limited number of them and will be hired based on merit.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

The alt right wants to be victims because you think it would justify your bigotry, but it wouldn't. Outside the context of your own personal land or business, you don't have a right to decide where other citizens are allowed to live or work, regardless of your sense of entitlement or the violation thereof.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

you don't have a right to decide where other citizens are allowed to live or work, regardless of your sense of entitlement or the violation thereof.

The sovereign group that holds power decides rights it gives to its subjects. Whether you care if it is fair or not doesn't matter. Nobody cares if you call it a big bad word because that is not how rights work.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

That's rich after all the victim cards you just tried to play. If that's your stance, what even is there to say? The alt right isn't a sovereign group and doesn't hold any power. Why should anybody else care how you feel?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You are the one appealing to victim arguments as justification for discrimination against whites. I am just recognizing the fact that the ruling class made it this way and it is useless to cry about it. The reason why alt-right ideas are spread is not to appeal to the ruling class, it is to appeal to whites that want their people to continue to exist in sovereign homelands in the next few hundred years. This is normal for every ethnic group, it only seems weird because White people are gaslight into believing they don't deserve a homeland and the right to exclude outsiders that threaten their safety and continued existence of their people, values and culture.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Ok but that's not really a thing, when you dig through the vague rhetoric all you actually want to do is enforce racial discrimination. You wouldn't help white people by persecuting the rest of society.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

There would be little to no racial discrimination because they would not live in white societies. Certainly, it would help white people by a massive reduction in crime, higher wages and morale boost because whites will no longer be lectured for being evil by virtue of existing around non-whites.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That's total nonsense. First of all, exiling all the nonwhite people in the first place would be race persecution on a historical scale. You're trying to prevent potential future crimes by committing 10 times as many crimes in the present, it's like saying we could prevent murder by imprisoning everybody. Second, you'd still discriminate against white people who are different from you. Third, none of this actually helps white people.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

First of all, exiling all the nonwhite people in the first place would be race persecution on a historical scale.

The replacement of white countries with foreigners is racial persecution on a massive scale. Repatriation will happen at a similar speed as the 1965 immigration act. If a small autonomous territory needs to be created for mixed raced peoples it will be done. The rest will be send back to their ethnic homelands or countries that will offer citizenship to foreigners. There will be lucrative financial incentives, worker training and resettlement programs to aid in assimilation into other countries.

You're trying to prevent potential future crimes by committing 10 times as many crimes in the present, it's like saying we could prevent murder by imprisoning everybody.

Deporting invaders is not a crime especially when it is for the self preservation of a native population. Also, we are not imprisoning everybody, we are sending foreigners peacefully back to their ethnic homelands or whatever country they please. They are not entitled to white countries and will be happier living among people like themselves.

Second, you'd still discriminate against white people who are different from you. Third, none of this actually helps white people.

It will help white people because they will live in a society catered toward their interests as a people. There are tribal and class tensions in every nation, but it will be easier to deal with because there is more unity within the population. if white is too granular in forming a unified nation, it can be split into multiple ethnic cantons or into separate states. Nations come and go and nothing is forever, but it doesn't mean we want our nations character to be completely subsumed by more distant foreign outsiders.