you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

You can take land but can you keep it, always the question. Thru history you see empires falling. You need to have alliances but they fall apart. Alexander the Great, that didn't last long. Napoleon, I compare Hitler to them. Why'd he let British go at Dunkirk, he may have had hopes for Britain to eventually join back up as allies. He invaded Poland, but Poland had an alliance to come to their aid, took a while but it did eventually. The english royal family had german ties, Hitler may have hoped eventually the join him. King Edward was a nazi but he fell in love with a honeypot like a dumbass, that may have ruined some plans. Suez canal, now they could have put all efforts to that, but man talk about valuable real estate, would they be able to keep that long? Being a water port also means it gets attacked by ships and subs. I know this wasn't jus tsenseless warmongering and if it wasn't Hitler someone else would have been in that position and the arrow of history was leading to war. Maybe if Hitler never existed Himmler would have been chancellor for example. Doesn't matter. What was germany supposed to do, sit back, slowly pay WWI reparations, duriing the great depression, not accept the free money from American businessmen? Profits and land were gained by some from this war that supported both sides.

[–]Richard_Parker 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Not sure how your response counters my rebuttal that Hitler attacked a lot of countries without justification. It was obviously unwise and brash to attack Poland the way he did. But had he dealt with the United Kingdom properly... Explain to me how invasion and occupation of these countries was not justifed or made necessary by the exigencies of war:

  • Denmark
  • Norway
  • Netherlands
  • Belgium
  • Yugoslavia

Greece as i said before was Italy's doing. France of course declared war on Germany, and had been an aggressor against Germany for centuries.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

not trying to counter you, you're right, this discussion is just me adding to it I guess, I'm posting more for lurkers than you. Brash and unwise, but then why do it, he was in a tough situation where you have to keep invading and attacking others to stay in power. Staying stagnant was not an option. It was all inevitable. Some say Hitler meant to take over the wntire world, no, and it was called World War one and two but it wasn't really the first world wars. All of history is one big war. American Revolutionary war was connected to the Napoleonic wars in Europe. Age of Pirates was a world war in the ocean. We have a world war going on right now thru the world.

[–]Richard_Parker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

In many ways the biggest error was to go after the rest of Czecjoslovakia after the Sudetenland crisis. While Fall Weiss set the dominoes in motion, it was not at all without some justifcation....

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think they wanted to have any land that had any german people in it, otherwise how could they call it the third reich, I do agree that was a mistake, difficult land to keep. Too many borders. After that they started thinking, let's take this other land adjacent to it so that can act as a buffer from our enemies, and it snowballed into wanting more and more worthless land.

[–]Richard_Parker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I do not think there were any Germans in what was left of Czechoslovakia proper after the Munich agreement. There were certainly no German majority areas....

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)