One of the most annoying aspects of liberalism is how it applies its principles universality on its opposition without taking into account on whether their opposition actually believes those principles and most of the time they don't honestly follow those principles themselves. Leftists are smarter than liberal conservatives in that they know that following a set of principles is meaningless if the opposition won't hold them accountable. Finally, if they need to justify continued mistreatment of groups that they oppose they appeal to the abstract realm of principles where tactically voicing their support in those principles matters more than how they act in reality.

Examples:

"If minorities are privileged that means you should want whites to become a minority."

"It is so ironic that white nationalists are opposing immigration because of what happened to the Native Americans"

"You can't advocate for restrictive immigration policies and deport non-whites because it could be violent"

"Opposing affirmative action is hypocritical because Whites had an advantage over non-whites during Jim Crow."

You are not a hypocrite for advocating for the interests of your group. You don't have to submit to the moral frame created by your enemies especially when they don't apply it to themselves. There is no reason to feel shame over conquering other groups because that is what different groups have been doing for thousands of years. The game has changed, it doesn't mean we have to give up of everything to other groups because they were losers at the old game.