Epstein's art (not the perverted stuff)

submitted by Vigte from i.imgur.com

all 21 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

So damn weird. You need like several teams of experts to dissect what is happening here but that can't happen for the obvious reasons

[–]StaresBlankly 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Teams of experts? It's just some 9/11 Inside Job conspiracy bullshit.

Sure, Bush was friendly with the Saudi royal family and yes the hijackers were Saudi Arabian citizens but it wasn't Saudi royalty that recruited and trained the terrorists. It was Osama Bin Laden, another Saudi Arabia citizen, that was behind the planning and execution of the 9/11.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LMAO yeah right. Epstein was so Saudi https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Osama was trained by the CIA to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. He was always a CIA asset.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, and Israel did 9/11 and tried to blame Palestinians, Saudi Arabia and Iraq right out of the gate. The corrupt oil barons of the Bush family, who have connections to the Bin Laden family as well as the Saudi arabia royal family had three choices.

Blame the Palestinians. Very bad choice considering if they did go through with this and did Mossad's bidding, Palestine would be wiped off the map in a day. Plus, George H. W. Bush was the first oresident to advocate a one state solution goving Palestinians full rights. Mossad even wanted to assassinate Bush Senior for witholding hundreds of millions in aid to Israel until they stopped building illegal settlements!! That's something not many people know about.

The 2nd choice was Iraq, and the MIC and Oil Barons as well as UNOCAL didn't care so much about Iraq as they did with Afghanistan and their LNG pipeline which the Neocons didn't care about, rather the neocons were eyeing Iraq.

The 3rd was to blame Saudis. The Bush family and the oil barons totally were not going to do that which the neocons hoped they would. These were the patsy hijackers with their mossad handlers the Israeli government wanted to frame and blame. The Bush family didn't want that.

So, they blamed Bin Laden and Saudis at the same time whoch is so retarded considering Bin Laden was an enemy of Saydi Arabia. This alone illustrates that the neocons and bush family were at odds with each other, both had blackmail on the other and both are corrupt to the core. And yet, both worked for each other reluctantly.

I believe the Bush family made a deal with the Neocons and then Iraq was next on the invade list.

[–]Literally_Hitler_ 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Israel was behind the attack.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Their were zero hijackers. Ellias Davidsson's book makes this clear. The hijackers were patsies with Mossad handlers.

Israeli Likudniks did 9/11 period.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ZioCons did 9/11 and demolished the towers with detcord and c4.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

9/11 was an outside job done by a subversive 5th column of Likudnik aligned Neoconservative dual-Israelis and Zionist Jewish Likudniks aligned with Mossad and the Israeli government.

[–]Lapis_Philosophorum 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This post sounds like Epstein drew the paintings (at least that's what I thought). He didn't, though he owned them. The painting was made in 2012 btw.

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/bill-clinton-blue-dress-painting-jeffrey-epstein-1628437

[–]Vigte[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I picked it up from reddit, I guess that was my first mistake.

[–]zyxzevn 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

You are MISSing Clinton

[–]Vigte[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That's a weird one too; I had seen it before but this Bush one was new to me today.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

this Bush one was new to me today.

The Clinton one is way too popular, I've seen it before too because of how notorious it is. I never saw this one though this is waaaaay more interesting

[–]sodomytron 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the story on the clinton 1 is the same as the bush 1. they're paintings that memorialize their great scandals. bush was involved with 9/11, clinton buttfucked monica lewinsky with a cigar and jizzed on her dress

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But what date was it painted?

I can definitely see something like that being a tone deaf anti-Bush attempt at satire.

[–]PostmodernJukebox 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

another comment says 2012 was when it was painted.

[–]shitpiss 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

the chair and the flags are on the opposite side of the desk implying that someone else is calling the shots cough-cough cheney?

[–]sodomytron 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

remember the song paper planes that came out a few years after 9/11? not a coincidence

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He didn't, thats just the same artist as the other one.

[–]PostmodernJukebox 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

this was painted in 2012 by someone criticizing bush.