So Kiwifarms is down. Could be Saidit be next? :(

submitted by [deleted] from self.censorship

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (33 children)

I hope so because this site sux

But let's be realistic

The levels of death threats made on saidit is probably not high enough to satisfy this bar

https://blog.cloudflare.com/kiwifarms-blocked/

Instead the one to watch will be, will Pelosi go against white house advice and ratify the senate's proposed law to instruct the secretary of state to label the ruzzia as a state supporter of terrorism.

You cannot run a website glorifying ISIS or al Qaida, spreading their propaganda magazines and videos. Because that would be against terror laws. And once the ruzzia is on that list, most of the crowd here will be breaking the same laws

[–]iamonlyoneman 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

and yet, here you are. you should improve the site by leaving if it's so bad

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

33% of Bidens administration is jewish.

Biden and Trumps grandchildren are both jewish. They are both zionists.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

oh no the bogeyan is out to get you!

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    k

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    The levels of death threats made on saidit is probably not high enough to satisfy this bar

    I have not seen any death threats or other illegal content on Kiwifarms. I'm sure whackos on FB probably take the number one spot for death threats but FB doesn't have these problems. This is retaliation by a particularly shitty tranny who is mad people say mean things about him.

    [–]Drewski 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Ironic comment considering your other account was banned for advocating the torture and murder of Tucker Carlson.

    [–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I dont know what it was banned for. The first thing I noticed was my home IP was blocked in cloudflare. Then when I could get in, the "reply" button wasn't there. The account still exists and you can view all the posts. And I have never ever written on either account about tucker carlson as far as I recall

    www.saidit.net/u/site_sux

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Drewski 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      To be fair it's easy to mix up the shills and trolls around here.

      [–]filbs111 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

      There don't need to be any legit threats. It just requires some any means necessary a-hole to make something up.

      [–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

      Ok is that what you conclude from cloudflare's history: That, no need for legit threats, anyone making anything up - and cloudflare will pull your account. I don't think you can genuinely think that. Because people make things up all the time and this is only the third website cloudflare have done this to.

      [–]filbs111 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

      Unless cloudflare is run by idiots, it seems like what's happening is that they're cynically going for optics, using the accusations as an excuse. Perhaps for a smaller site that wasn't already targeted by those with power, such accusations wouldn't result in getting binned. The point is, you don't know. Their service is now a vulnerability.

      [–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

      What you're saying makes no sense when we consider that this is only the third time in their history that they're removed a user.

      They have many questionable customers. And lots of bad things get said about those questionable internet sites who nevertheless are allowed to use cloudflare.

      In fact probably like 99.999% of the questionable shit at cloudflare is allowed to stay up. And only 0.001% has been taken down, all three times because of murderish behavior

      [–]filbs111 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

      If we did suppose that cloudflare has a consistently applied policy that has only ever been infringed 3 times, it would seem quite a big coincidence that the infringing post was made on kiwifarms so shortly after cloudflare had posted a blog about the site.

      [–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

      It's not a coincidence at all,.nobody is saying that it's a coincidence

      https://blog.cloudflare.com/kiwifarms-blocked/

      Beginning approximately two weeks ago, a pressure campaign started with the goal to deplatform Kiwifarms. That pressure campaign targeted Cloudflare as well as other providers utilized by the site

      ...

      However, as the pressure campaign escalated, so did the rhetoric on the Kiwifarms site. Feeling attacked, users of the site became even more aggressive. Over the last two weeks, we have proactively reached out to law enforcement in multiple jurisdictions highlighting what we believe are potential criminal acts and imminent threats to human life that were posted to the site.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      This is what he means, look at this timeline. https://i.imgur.com/ChzaT89.jpg

      [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      You're the guy who believes search result pages are information which you can source in an argument. No wonder you fell for another image macro.

      Here you are assuming that you and the kiwi admins are correct in the suspicion that you know what content cloudflare objected to. There's not even a tiny doubt that you might be wrong about which post a cloudflare exec saw in his private browsing?

      Cloudflare already said they had been in touch with cops multiple times about worrying content.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      You're the guy who believes search result pages are information which you can source in an argument.

      I was trying to point you to some basic information gathering. There seems to be an issue at a basic level of you finding info and properly analyzing it. With a better technique you can improve your abilities, maybe, you might just be dumb.

      Here you are assuming that you and the kiwi admins are correct in the suspicion that you know what content cloudflare objected to. There's not even a tiny doubt that you might be wrong about which post a cloudflare exec saw in his private browsing?

      You're assuming the opposite and defending that stance with no evidence. 🤦‍♀️

      [–]filbs111 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

      I smell bullshit. They're incentivised to make a marketing story like that.

      [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      They have the same incentives all day every day but have only done it three times. That just doesn't make any sense. Why doesn't the same incentive apply to every other hate site?

      And what marketing have they done? Where do you see adverts like "sign up for cloudflare, because we kicked out kiwifarms"

      Now you're just making shit up

      [–]filbs111 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      The people who want to prevent people communicating freely on sites like Kiwifarms are organised. The pressure exerted is not constant in time, nor aimed at everywhere at once.

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        they were in the process of doxxing several people, ranging from Hunter Biden to mass shooters

        I've not been there but their wiki page says that they intend to cause and celebrate the suicides of the people that they dox, harass, and swatt.

        The deaths mentioned there amongst people who they targeted were from a transgender person, an two autistic people, one of whom was also non-binary.

        No mass murderers. Just people who are especially likely to be able to be harassed to suicide.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        that they intend to cause and celebrate the suicides of the people that they dox, harass, and swatt

        You can't trust Wikipedia, or the media for that matter. The "lolcows," are their entertainment, in a way they're kinda huge fans of these people, just not for positive reason. I heard the founder was even trying to raise money for Chris Chan's legal defense before it came out that he raped his mother. Chris Chan is why Kiwifarms exists.

        Check it out for yourself, the thread addresses what's going on and absolutely nobody in the media cares to share the other side. https://kiwifarms.ru/threads/keffals-clara-sorrenti-lucas-john-roberts-queen-clara-the-fart-dominatrix-sorrentihott.115295/

        Keffals hates women and is generally an awful person. Kiwifarms exposes that, that's what their crime is.