a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

this is all dandy until a tyrant op comes around and starts deleting and banning like crazy (eg: u/snow, u/critias). in which case it is best if the sub mod works on the situation, rather than waiting for the admins to intervene. this is from past experience and i am sure it will happen again. there will always be reckless people who will usurp even the slightest power. and we must keep the admins from being bogged down in drama and let them work on the site.

edit: you are just over your two-week time limit to be able to create a sub, so you can have your freedom even now to both post whatever you want and to be a mod over it

edit2:

re doing the inverse of what reddit is doing

again, this sounds good, but there is this quite substantial fact that saidit is running on reddit code..

a close relative of censorship, saidit is already corrupted. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]d3rr 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i appreciate this post and getting called out, keep them coming. it does look scammy that it says 15k subscribed to a sub but there might zero or only a few posts. but we shan't edit the database and at least we never seeded the site with bot content or alts. and thanks for the kind words.

there has been some interest in bot policy lately. some needs to post to askSaidIt "what should the bot policy be?"

there is no downvote here, but bots are posting links to saidit regularly. another factor is that people might want the ability to run comment bots, like an archive.org bot, or a video conversion bot. anyway we're open to improving this place.

a close relative of censorship, saidit is already corrupted. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]candyboxradio[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

ok, first let me say that if i look at /s/wallstreetbets and i see EXACTLY 15,000 readers, that does not look like users that got registered as readers just for being users... if that were the case, the number of readers shown would be an odd number like 9,624 but it would not be an exactly round number like 15,000.

i have some experience with trading(tho i always lost money, lol) and whenever someone would show a screenshot of their account and it began with EXACTLY $100,000.00 then it is probably probably probably a demo play money account... pretty much guaranteed.

so, when /s/wallstreetbets shows exactly 15,000 readers AND i only see about a half dozen posts and i only see six users online, then it is pretty much guaranteed that somehow someway those are fake readers shown on that page.

personally, i dont need to see ten other forums that show questionable reader numbers..

all respect.

a close relative of censorship, saidit is already corrupted. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]candyboxradio[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

all respect to you and this fine site, no disrespect intended, absolutely..

i am something of a professional at spotting flaws, lol, which is useless of course unless it is done with good intentions.

i want to describe my intent, kind sir or madam, and that is that i really enjoy reddit, except for one issue, i hate reddit.

i hate their bots, i hate reading posts and i have to wonder if i am interacting with some stupid python script or if it is a real person.. your site should incorporate features that make it impossible to use bots, but do not in any way inconvenience users.

i hate their downvotes, it silences me, groups can silence my posts and make them hidden, damm bullies.

i would enjoy consulting with your new company, i believe that i could help you to overtake the entire marketplace.

seriously.

a close relative of censorship, saidit is already corrupted. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How is SaidIt corrupted? Just because one sub and some users seem fishy?

Proof needed.

Removed From Youtube - David Icke's Explosive Interview with London Real by ArnoldBorgenstein in censorship

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's with the sound quality? London Real doesn't usually sound like this! :-(

Still, great upload, THANK YOU.

a close relative of censorship, saidit is already corrupted. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]d3rr 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We used to auto subscribe everyone to all subs when we were small. You won't see this happen anymore, now we are setup like Reddit.

We also have 'reset subscriptions' if anyone wants to start over with their subscriptions.

a close relative of censorship, saidit is already corrupted. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A lot of people on saidit are subscribed to ALL and that bumps it up. I will now unsubscribe. Saidit has grown so much that ALL is a bit too much anyway.

a close relative of censorship, saidit is already corrupted. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]Horrux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I'm on both and the one on here has been a desert.

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]FormosaOolong 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree with you re: exploring all opinions. I like this site specifically because I can engage with a variety of points of view without being pepper-sprayed with derision.

Some things you may have missed or misunderstood:

1) this is not my house and i am not a mod or an owner, just a user

2) there is no downvoting

3) there is a block user and a mute sub option (that are admittedly hard to find)

4) the PoD is here to keep discussion interesting/reasonable and not just a tar pit of name-calling

5) the other rules are in place to avoid breaking the laws where the server lives so the site doesn't get axed

6) most of your suggestions are already in place

7) moderators exist to maintain the Pyramid of Debate which is the model for conduct here

Your main complaint is about censorship--which is minimal here--yet you would like the power as OP to censor the voices you don't like.

Mods only remove posts that grossly violate the Pyramid of Debate. I doubt you would gain any insight reading those comments as they are typically just random slurs. People who harass and name call are given a wide berth before they are removed, which they are only when they persist relentlessly. Maybe you haven't found the block user button, the location of which I regularly forget. Maybe u/magnora7 or u/d3rr can point you to it.

Here is also a page you may have missed, as it also not very obvious: https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/37r/welcome_to_saiditnet/ It explains the way the site works and details the PoD.

It's great that you care about free speech of all varieties. Thank you also for providing suggestions where you've seen room for improvement.

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]candyboxradio[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i am responding to both useless_aether and la_cues here:

there is no reason to think(my opinion, lol) of the OP as a "mini-mod" AND there is no need to also have a "real mod"..

if it were understood that the rules of this forum are that the OP has moderation priviliges over his threads, then that would become house rules.

i find it restricting when i am told what i cant read by the "real mod"...

i am going to quote user FormosaOolong from one of his previous posts in another thread:

"The control of information is the final step before totalitarian rule"..

obviously, this site is attempting to compete with reddit, this site is a reddit clone, lol.. so other than the look and feel, dont try to be reddit... do the inverse of what reddit is doing... allow free speech.. dont allow bots, but dont inconvenience users in the process..

it is not easy to be the best, in fact it is almost not possible.

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]candyboxradio[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

after briefly reading your posting history, i see that you have an interest in the 5g issues and you also wrote "The control of information is the final step before totalitarian rule"..

to me, 5g seems to be dangerous, but if people get squelched by "moderators" then i am not able to read both/all sides of the story. i want to be able to read the good and the bad and the ugly and the insane opinions. i want it all. i would prefer to not read only those opinions that the moderator agrees with.

at reddit, there are issues with moderators that i dont like... for example, i enjoy reading about topics that i am not even interested in, but i am only able to read posts that have not been removed by that forum's moderators.

the rich are able to speak their message freely because they have the ability to pay for advertising.. i think that the average joe should have the same ability to speak freely and not be squelched by moderators, with the exception that if he is disruptive to a particular conversation.

personally, i think that alex jones is a tad insane, but i enjoy listening to him, so why does youtube block him? i have to listen to alexjones at http://banned.video omg.

if i start a thread, and alexjones is disruptive then i as the OP should have the ability to remove alexjones from my thread, but alexjones should have the ability to start his own threads freely.

yes, in most cases it is more than weird for me to visit someone else's house and immediately start advising them how to arrange their furniture, but saidit is not "your house"... a public forum really should not be operated as "your house", but instead it should be operated as a public forum where others may freely express themselves, with a few exceptions:

1) users should have the ability to block other users.. for example, i should have the ability to block alexjones, which means that i will not see his threads and he will not be able to respond to my threads(but he would be able to read my threads)..

if that rule is followed, why do we need a moderator that oversees the politics forum, for example? if that rule is followed, the forum would be self governing and all would be free to express themselves..

please understand that it is not my intent to tell you how to arrange the furniture in your house, but instead it is my intent to suggest to you how you can be better than reddit and how to be the best forum.

do you want to be a moderator or do you want to be the best forum in the world?

kind regards,

edward.

edit: i personally think that if my suggestions were implemented at this forum, you could invite people like alexjones here, and his viewers would follow him here, and your forum would blow up like a bomb. you see, i dont really give a fk if some moderator likes alexjones... i want to listen to alexjones if i want to listen to alexjones... with all respect, of course.

My Entire Channel DEMONETIZED No Warning No Strikes No Real Reason! (12:08) ~ Jason Bermas by JasonCarswell in censorship

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

/s/news/comments/3qne/youtube_demonetization_surge/

Also:

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]la_cues 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hmm, idk mixed feelings.

It would at least have to say "COMMENTS MODERATED BY OP" in 36px font when this is happening.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think you justt do control print/screen then. Or option print/screen or shift printscreen.

It's one of them and you hold it for a little. I think there is a plugin that you download on I believe the synaptic manager.

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i like no.2. make the op a temporary 'mini mod', but allow the real mod to override his actions, just how the admins can override the mods.

make it an option on the submit form (click 'i want to mod this thread').

take responsibility for your own posts..

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i want the complete page, not just what's visible on the screen. but i temporarily scratched the itch with a plugin.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]danuker[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Archive.today it is.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Doesn't control option print/screen work? I used linux awhile back and I'm positive it was already set up.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I get an access denied error.

If this is consistently true, though, I may have to reconsider donating to archive.org. I donated to them before, but if they keep doing this, I'm not so sure about doing this in the future.

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]FormosaOolong 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most of the subs here are populated by lovely people who are able to disagree fruitfully. If you don't like the atmosphere in a particular sub, empower yourself to back away, mute that sub, and have a wander to the areas that suit you better.

Have you thought that it's a bit of a weird thing to be in someone else's house for just three days and immediately start talking about how you don't like their housekeeping?

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]candyboxradio[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

then i would just stay at reddit, and deal with the downvoting... truth is that i am a veteran C programmer and so i know how to fake vote my own posts if they get downvoted, but i dont really want to deal with all of that, it is a bit childish..

if your thinking is that bullying is a good thing, then you should consider that war is simply bullying with guns and bombs, and if we continue arguing then we are headed for world war three.

the internet should be a safe space where people can discuss issues..

but instead what we now have is a bit like an antifa rally where the ones that throw the hardest punches win the debate.

best wishes.

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bullying? What? Sorry, this is the internet, not a safe space. We play rough. If you block users you won't see their posts, and that's good enough.

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]candyboxradio[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i am so happy to hear that downvoting has been removed, this is definitely an improvement over reddit.

Not down with the censorship and banning. Bad idea.

i am not suggesting censorship at all, but i am suggesting that if i start a thread to discuss a particular topic that i should not get attacked by unwelcome commenters, they can destroy my ability to discuss some topic.

if i were to block a person from posting in a topic that i start as OP, they would always be able to start their own thread.. this is not censorship, but instead this prevents bullying.

if saidit is able to overcome these forum shortcomings, you then will have a chance to overtake reddit and lead the marketplace.

fk reddit.

a suggestion to saidit that will make saidit much better than reddit. by candyboxradio in censorship

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Uh the downvoting has already been removed. That's one of the selling points here.

Not down with the censorship and banning. Bad idea.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

good point

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Great to know!

https://archive.today/ Top right look for "BOOKMARKLET"

archive.today (formerly archive.is) ~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, TOR is based on Mozilla, who has been infiltrated and subverted by Google, etc.

TOR was never safe anyway. I suspect it may be a trap too. It was initially developed by the Navy. Who knows how many entrance and exit nodes they control.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I use Greenshot. Haven't looked for others in years. There are also plenty of screenshot browser addons.

A webpage-scraper would be better to catch the text, the code, and the images - all to archive. Then you can copy text, rather than have it trapped in the image.

Hi, I published 3 books full of the ideas that are being censored everywhere by jmichaelhudsondotnet in censorship

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow. I found your blog here, and everything you say makes sense!

An open non-racist culture will be infiltrated by all manner of divergent people, to drive away fellow citizens who may share their common ethnicity.

Some extremists on Voat put me off. It seems the site is down as well, now. I hope it doesn't happen to Saidit. Dear magnora7, please implement countermeasures on Saidit!

You might find an ally in Richard Stallman; he's as anti-surveillance as you are. Free-as-in-freedom software is a useful tool in a free society.

I will share your books. I thank you for them.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

i am so TORn..

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]danuker[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'd advise against addons in Torbrowser.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]danuker[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I edited the comment so it's clearer.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

yeah, maybe it will never happen.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]H3v8 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't torbrowser a rebundled firefox? Then maybe they have removed that feature for whatever reason as this has been in firefox for quite some time.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]Drewski 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If you want to be sure something is archived, save it yourself. Archive.today's download as zip feature works well for this.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]Chungus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Kuro5hin was censored by the web archive as well before it was shut down by Rusty Foster.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

that's great, thanks. hope torbrowser will have it soon. until then i installed an addon called nimbus

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]H3v8 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If you use firefox, you can just right click on page and select "take a screenshot". I don't use firefox myself, so no idea how good it is.

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

All the info is there. Better than anonymous sources familiar with the matter.

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what valid point, what science ...there's no link? I think you'er a misled simpleton, please convey my condolences to your mother.

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no link.....lol, I call BULLSHIT.

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if you only knew the irony. TTYL.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't understand.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]useless_aether 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

question: is there a linux based utility or plugin that takes a screenshot of the html page in the browser? not just what's on the screen but all of it. then we could upload that to any image hosting site..

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]rightykiller 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ill report you to ICE

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]danuker[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You can experience it for yourself by trying to archive my list. Archive.org says it's done, but when you click the link, it says it's never been archived.

Edit: clarifications

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Can't vote on it either. Would have liked to have seen it.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]danuker[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I tried to save some pages with tables today, but it didn't save them, after it showed me the page once.

A video about the Wayback Machine deleting some sites immediately was deleted from Reddit. You can't even find out who posted it. by danuker in censorship

[–]danuker[S] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I just ran into this while trying to archive the Romanian list of authorized telecom companies.

This is serious censorship, a la Ministry of Truth.

Hi, I published 3 books full of the ideas that are being censored everywhere by jmichaelhudsondotnet in censorship

[–]H3v8 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How do you find the leanpub platform and how is it regarding free speech? Is it any better than createspace?

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Uh...why is it that you do not address any of the very valid points raised?

Instead you attempt to discredit the scientists? What's wrong with you? Why do you hate science?

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]eladmiral 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We need more studies like this. Please think for yourself no matter what age/sex you are. There are people every day in the news trying to silence others.

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]RickC-137 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

haha...does your butt hurt? report me to reddit mods

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Click bait title as always from Chipit the known shill.

The study was conducted exclusively along the portrail of low status groups. It's says nothing about broad liberal views on censorship.

It's a study about a well known fact.

If you're a SJW then you generally support SJW issues, and would like less coverage that discredits your expressed general position.

Nobody likes info that conflicts with their world view.

Everybody would prefer to see evidence that supports their world view.

Please let me know if a population exists that this inherent fact does not apply to.

More low-brow research from the folks that send Chipit material to post.

The abstract and "results" couldn't be less objective.

Recent work has suggested that Liberals have sacred values about protecting low status groups and thus are particularly prone to bias against any information that portrays those groups unfavorably. In a preregistered study (n = 559), we tested whether Liberals would support more censorship of information that portrays low status groups unfavorably (that men evolved to be better leaders than women, that Islam is violent and incites terrorism, and that white people score higher on intelligence tests than black people) than similar information that portrays high status groups unfavorably (that women evolved to be better leaders than men, that Christianity is violent and incites terrorism, and that black people score higher on intelligence tests than white people). The results very clearly supported predictions. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low status groups unfavorably more than information that portrays high status groups unfavorably. Moderates and Conservatives supported more similar levels of censorship regardless of whether the information was favorable toward relatively high or low status groups, but Conservatives did display a small preference for censoring Christian violence over Islamic violence. Exploratory analyses also revealed that Millennials might be slightly more in support of censorship than Generation X in general, but Baby Boomers’ censorship support generally fell between that of Generation X and Millennials.

I agree that SJWs are idiots.

However, this research is clickbait propaganda.

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]RuckFeddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OK so complete it. Review the studies and get back to us. We're clearly mentally incapable as you felt the need to warn us before reading.

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]RuckFeddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't have permission to access "http://www.wqad.com/2019/10/03/new-study-concludes-women-and-liberals-more-likely-to-support-censorship-hold-double-standards/" on this server. Reference #18.47f57a5c.1585930843.39e28905

Can someone archive it and link?

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]rightykiller 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

loser

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]RickC-137 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nice snope tactic - trying to discredit something without any proof or substance. "something something something. False"

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]RickC-137 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'd put gay men in that group also.

New study concludes women, millennials, and liberals more likely to support censorship, hold double standards. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low-status groups unfavorably. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Captzapheart 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Warning; Genrally a study is part of a report, there are many studies compiled into a report, therefore studies are an incomplete picture, not untruthful but nearly alway incomplete.

Should the shock websites Best Gore and The YNC be censored? by fanterbanter in censorship

[–]legendgamer320 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Short answer; No.

Reminder: everyone likes and encourages censorship... by teelo in censorship

[–]0O_O0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's for our own good.

I got banned from discord... by Crad in censorship

[–]Crad[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's bs... What was the purpose of that server? Just curious.

I got banned from discord... by Crad in censorship

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah they perma'ed my old discord account for being on the chadfish discord server. I'd never sent a message on it. When they don't like a server they just perma everyone who was on it.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ugh, very true. I've in a facebook group for my town, every time I see an interesting post, I scroll down to find the admins already locked it.

NPR Station Stops Airing Trump Coronavirus Briefings For ‘False Information’ (Big Pharma wants him silenced) by Tom_Bombadil in censorship

[–]Canbot 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are people dying and these pieces of shit are denying them treatment with the excuse that it isn't tested. This is so fucking retarded even if you believe everything they say. The media is fucking evil.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Update: Had a short workout but the woman in yoga pants was still not there. Today there were five people there so they are coming back.

Today the comedian who was my username namesake died, supposedly of...you guessed it. He was 70, known to be a heavy smoker, carouser, and single for life, he made no bones about his love for young girls. He was out clubbing with some just before he was hospitalized. Now will come a deluge of Corona BS since he is the first celebrity to die of plain old ordinary flu this year. Its sad and it is sad that he will be the poster senior for that alleged disease. Hey folks, don't you see? If you have lung damage and are 65+ and a heavy smoker, you can get pneumonia and die. Because pneumonia is what really kills most older people in the end. As one doctor I quoted on here said, and I paraphrase: yes, this is a pandemic. I know because I've seen thirty pandemics, one every year, since I became a doctor. One more question for saiditters: do you think 9/11 was an inside job involving some US citizens and some people from the ME? No, not Saudi, the other one. If so, why can't CoV-19 also be an inside job? Do you know why in N. Italy so many people are dying, because it seems they are? Because that area has the worst air pollution in Europe and a preponderance of old people. As another doctor I quoted said: CoV=19 is a spook. I don't know if he meant that as a pun.

Apologies Tom for going on like this in a message to you. Just like 9/11 it is going to take a few years for most people to get it but by then we'll all be on full-time lockdown and there will be nothing to do about it.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Malki 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agree. Mods from many sites are censoring shit. Even 4chan. They are afraid weak cowards will read it and murder themselves. Lots of people are too weak to handle the truth.

NPR Station Stops Airing Trump Coronavirus Briefings For ‘False Information’ (Big Pharma wants him silenced) by Tom_Bombadil in censorship

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Source(s)?

The use of chloroquine is going to seriously cut into the vaccine profits.

This has big pharma alarmed.

Political correctness is not a harmless phenomenon that sprang up of its own volition. It is a poisonous weapon intended to stifle debate and to shut down logical thinking. by useless_aether in censorship

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it's the wolves who want to pacify us completely, to make us all into lambs.

they are hungry..

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know, it was awesome. Filled with disinfo but basically the wild west; completely uncenaored but in the end owned by a gatekeeper.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I suspect igan was onto something, which is why he was paid a visit.

The Australian wildfires are certainly manmade. It reeks of agenda 21.

Political correctness is not a harmless phenomenon that sprang up of its own volition. It is a poisonous weapon intended to stifle debate and to shut down logical thinking. by useless_aether in censorship

[–]Malki 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would not say that the alternative to political correctness is harmless. But I agree it's to shut down debate most certainly. Also kind of narrow minded and cowardly that people think things need to be harmless in the first place.

Censored by Medium: Evidence over hysteria — COVID-19 A sensible and thorough analysis of the data that suggests the hype is overblown. The Internet Deities have decided we should not see that blasphemy. by FormosaOolong in censorship

[–]Malki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I stopped reading when he said it was mathematically impossible for as many people to be infected as they believe. Until testing can back that up this man doesn't know shit.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm glad we agree on the flu. Here the cases of "normal" flu are in fact down. Even Dr. Fauci the crook, uh doctor who advises Trump admitted yesterday that CoV cases were much lower than he originally said, by about a factor of ten. Preaching to the choir.

Now I gotta go to the GYM and spread viruses. I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore. :)

Oh, I have never entertained for a moment that the earth is flat and will not be watching Igan again.

NPR Station Stops Airing Trump Coronavirus Briefings For ‘False Information’ (Big Pharma wants him silenced) by Tom_Bombadil in censorship

[–]Malki 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ironic since he's such a big supporter of big pharma.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey, I didn't mean to be critical at all. Think but don't worry more. The best thing you can do is go about your life as usual, except where prohibited by law. :)

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe that is his message to us: don't believe this stuff they're making me say.

That was my take on the situation. I never followed him, but saw a decent quality breakdown.

He claimed flat Earth was the most important discovery of his life. Even if that was true, you'd have to assume that it would be a gradual warming up to the F-Earth idea.

Flat Earth as a concept is crazier in scope than 9/11, and it's difficult to imagine digesting the scope of 9/11 in a few days.

Probably most of us feel at bit soul dead right about now but let's keep on keeping on.

Yeah, I thought the Covid was a hoax from the start, so I'm kind of pumped up about the fact that the narrative is in the process of unraveling.

Keep in mind: France and other countries didn't lockdown or self-quarantine like the US. The narrative may be hijacked to suggest the quarantine saved the world.

Covid is a hoax. ;-)

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]dafadu 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're actually right. I'll worry some more.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Really???

Aw fuuuuck...

I loved 153... It was a no-holds-barred wild West of videos...

That's a tragedy... :-(

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just search Jason Boss. He still has videos on YouTueb and has an Israel lawyer. He also worked for Google and during the 153news Side Thorne fiasco he shilled the most overty PsyOp I think I've ever seen. The guy is a plant and his site a honeypot meant to migrate all the truth seekers to his site so that they could eventually memoryhole it all for good.

That isn't to say the videos on the site were bad, there were plenty of good people on 153 mixed with disinformation agents.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for that Tom. I never followed him but someone used to send his links once in a while and he seemed quite reasonable. Then right after the mosque non-incident must have been when they got to him, as you said. They, I suppose, can make offers that few can refuse. Since then, he has seemed more and more soul dead, a shadow of his former self, at those few times I saw him. But I never watched him enough to know about his flat earth talk. Maybe that is his message to us: don't believe this stuff they're making me say. Probably most of us feel at bit soul dead right about now but let's keep on keeping on.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]yaboihenry5678 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don’t like the Alternative Right either, but censorship does nothing to benefit the world.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]fruitjack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if that means the alt reichers have to take it back to the local gutter, i'm all for it.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He is.

I think the spooks got to him.

He went "flat Earth" on video, and had a swastika drawn on his hand during his announcement. It seemed a bit forced and not at all legit. He also made claims about his real name, and why he went by his moniker.

It appeared his work was being suicided.

Who really knows anymore..?

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Source?

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Especially when it becomes more clear that the data from Italy was mostly hoaxed.

I haven't seen any of this info, but was close to certain that this was the case.

Do you gave any links to this info.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]newblicious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This has been the trend before the quarantine, but I agree.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can't say for sure, but don't believe so. If someone mentions flat earth seriously, I automatically dismiss anything else they have said and never listen to them again. I first heard of him when he did good work on the New Zealand mosque "shooting, exposing it for the hoax it was. There is an update now on his crowhouse.com describing how the hoax was pulled off.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Event 201 called for mass Internet censorship, so it was only a matter of time.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yup, it was a DHS plant site from the beginning. Migrate all the truth seekers to his site and when the time is right memoryhole all of it.

Bitchute does the same, UK Critical Thinker's videos have constantly been deleted on bitchute. Bitchute is owned by a Zionist, as is nearly every freaking social media site.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah, the owner was a plant from the very beginning. He was a Jew and former Google employee. He also pushed thr Side Thorne PsyOp.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's a flat earther, no?

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As STATED IN EVENT 201.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Some sites went down due to the financial crash.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To backup my claims:

https://saidit.net/s/Coronavirus/comments/3ku8/it_is_over_experts_drastically_alter_course_on/cxmd

https://saidit.net/s/Coronavirus/comments/3l19/exclusive_look_inside_new_york_and_new_jersey/

And the video from Germany.

Doctors to Media: “There is no dangerous Corona Pandemic” Video in German with translations Mediziner gegen Medien: “Es gibt keine gefährliche Corona-Pandemie” https://www.bitchute.com/video/DHaeLixie3wK/

There are not many patients in hospital. Wrong treatments likely have caused deaths. Media create an imaginary Pandemic..

(Summary at the end:) In Italy, the Traffic deaths and Cancer deaths, are put on the Corona list, to make the number bigger. The Italian government does this to get more funding from the EU, for their well-known economic problems.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Especially when it becomes more clear that the data from Italy was mostly hoaxed.
They added cancer-deaths and traffic-accidents-deaths to the covid-19 data. This is already known in official documents.

Most hospitals are extremely quiet too. And most people ask what the F is going on.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A little? Dude, this is the beginning of the Brave New World Order.

Opinion: The Quarantine Days Will Quickly Turn Internet Sanitized and Curated More Than Ever by Crad in censorship

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Max Igan is an enigma but he predicts the entire Internet will go down about Easter (April 7) and then come back in a new disinfected form. He also says some people will disappear during the downtime. No, I am not saying that will happen. Interestingly, Trump said in an interview that he hopes to have the panic under control by some time around "Easter." Easter and the time of year, has had so much symbolism around it for thousands of years or more, it boggles my easily-boggled mind.

view more: next ›