you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

its not even called Global Warming (GW) as even the village idiots have seen its not happening (algore the scientific moron said we'd be all under water by now from 20 years ago)

Climate Change is so vague you can blame any incidents on it and the rubes will gobble it up.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

its not even called Global Warming (GW)

Yes it is.

even the village idiots have seen its not happening

Only the village idiots have seen it not happening, because they won't look.

In my life, winters are milder and arrive later, spring arrives earlier. Thankfully summers in my city don't seem to be heating up (yet) but over much of the rest of the country summers are hotter than ever before.

At the same time, we're getting more weird weather. About 30 years ago, we started getting anomalous cold snaps in late December. We've even had snow in December. Well, we call it snow, not that there's enough to make a snowman, let alone ski, but its still snow. Snow, in Melbourne! In December! That's unheard of.

Or at least, until the 1990s it was unheard of. Now we get cold snaps and frigid, Antarctica air dumping rain, hail and occasionally even snow around Christmas time probably two out of five or six years. That ain't normal. Or rather, it wasn't normal for Melbourne for hundreds of years. But now the climate has changed. There's more heat in the oceans, and the atmosphere, and its changing the flow of water and air.

Climate Change is so vague

If global temperatures rise, the climate changes. Why is this controversial?

"BuT I tHoUGhT evErYThINg WoULd StAy tHE SaME wHEn ThINgS cHAnGE!!1!"

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I guess you did too much LDS since the 2000s to have missed the CLIMATE CHANGE relabeling

for the anecdotals the media now claims as its signs you might wish to go back decades in newspapers to see similar events hear and their for the last century

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I guess you did too much LDS since the 2000s to have missed the CLIMATE CHANGE relabeling

Yes, it's true, I've done a lot on Mormons since the 2000s, they're nearly as kinky as Catholic school girls.

"Climate Change" has always been the more common term, back to the 60s and 70s and there has never been a time that "global warming" was more popular.

You might not realise this if your experience only goes back to the early 2000s on the internet, where google searches for "global warming" were more popular for a few years. But trust me, there is more to life than what people see on the internet.

But why do you care so much over such a trivial fact? If the planet warms, the climate will change.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

google star trek references

you think climate change goes back, but its been trumpeted by the demlefty media in the recent times as had global warming which it has now replaced as the faux crisis clarion call -- magnitudes more than all than went before

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You don't need to look at complicated science to see that climate is changing.

For hundreds of years, every lethal bush fire in Australia has happened at the height of summer. Now they're starting to occur at the start of spring.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

and idiot humans have no part in that ?

in the US greenies policy not letting brush be cleared and trees cut down near power lines

robust invading species outgrowing natives ? nah can possibly happen

cyclic weather patterns - happens

lots of shit going on with lefty pushing mass amnesia in their foisted agenda

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

and idiot humans have no part in that ?

The anthropogenic word in "Anthropogenic global warming" means "man made", so of course idiot humans have a part in this.

in the US greenies policy not letting brush be cleared and trees cut down near power lines

Yeah, I use that excuse whenever the missus nags me to cut the lawn. "Sorry dear, the greenies won't let me."

Blaming the greens for power company failure is a common trick. Funny enough, nobody can actually point to the actual law that prevents power companies keeping their power lines safe. It's always just rumour: "the greenies won't let 'em".

In any case, that's irrelevant to my comment. Failure to maintain the lines isn't going to bring bushfire season forward by four or five months. To get bushfires and wildfires you need two things: there has to be fuel (leaf litter, twigs, dead branches etc), and the conditions have to be right.

If the fuel has more than 30% moisture content, you cannot get a wildfire. If the moisture content falls below 10%, its a bomb waiting to go off.

It used to take four or five months from the end of winter to the point that you can have bushfires in Australia. Now it happens in just a month or two. That's nothing to do with greenies preventing power companies from maintaining the safety of their power lines.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anthropogenic global warming

except that phrase is rarely used and most of the 'bought into its' assume everybody does]

there is climate change, but humans in the equation are barely a smudge on the surface of the sun

i was stating causes of many of the fires which have happened in the US

and you obviously have your excuses for being on of the 'bought into it' lemmings