you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I guess you did too much LDS since the 2000s to have missed the CLIMATE CHANGE relabeling

for the anecdotals the media now claims as its signs you might wish to go back decades in newspapers to see similar events hear and their for the last century

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I guess you did too much LDS since the 2000s to have missed the CLIMATE CHANGE relabeling

Yes, it's true, I've done a lot on Mormons since the 2000s, they're nearly as kinky as Catholic school girls.

"Climate Change" has always been the more common term, back to the 60s and 70s and there has never been a time that "global warming" was more popular.

You might not realise this if your experience only goes back to the early 2000s on the internet, where google searches for "global warming" were more popular for a few years. But trust me, there is more to life than what people see on the internet.

But why do you care so much over such a trivial fact? If the planet warms, the climate will change.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

google star trek references

you think climate change goes back, but its been trumpeted by the demlefty media in the recent times as had global warming which it has now replaced as the faux crisis clarion call -- magnitudes more than all than went before