Thank you, SaidIt...

submitted by Godknight from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]weavilsatemyface 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (29 children)

There are only 2 genders.

People do not have gender. "Gender" is made-up bullshit. People have a sex, and there are exactly two sexes.

The only actual meaning of "gender" is a technical term from linguistics (the study of languages), where languages can have no genders, two, three, or as many as twenty categories for nouns and verbs.

[–]J_Hard_R_Tolkien 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Wait till you find out about John Money.

[–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Oh yes, I know all about John Money. The question is, how many other pro-Trans therapists are as twisted as he was?

[–]Musky 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

"Gender" is made-up bullshit

It's not, gender has meant the same thing as sex for almost as long as the word existed. There's been a push to redefine the term to legitimize gender identity. Push back against that, whenever someone says "ackshually gender and sex are different," tell them no, no they aren't. Or at least they didn't use to be until it was convienient for their ideology.

[–]Godknight[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is the best take.

Words exist because people give them meaning.

When I was a kid, literally everyone was using gender and sex synonymously.

And for me that will never change.

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

gender has meant the same thing as sex for almost as long as the word existed

Not quite.

The word "gender" meaning "class or kind" goes back to around 1300, which is now effectively obsolete except for very specialised uses like the gender of plugs (male or female). It took about a century for the grammatical meaning to appear, and another century for people to start using "gender" as a humorous, deliberately over-technical term for the two sexes. A little like using "sanitation engineer" for the guy who picks up the trash, or perhaps something like "Marines are a different species from the rest of us".

But the modern use of gender as a euphemism for "sex" comes from the second half of the 20th century, and the even more modern sense of gender as some nebulous, undefined and undefinable feeling about what sex you are is even more recent. Euphemisms are bad enough, but the modern "gender" is self-contradictory and incoherent nonsense on stilts.

If you ask trans activists, they themselves cannot decide whether sex and gender are different, or rather, they will flip from one belief to the other whenever convenient:

  • Gender identity is a social construct that has nothing to do with the two male and female sexes;
  • but "sex is a spectrum" and there are more than two sexes;
  • and trans women are real women;
  • gender identity is inherent to me, and has nothing to do with social expectations;
  • but if society calls me by the wrong pronoun, or "dead-names" me, my identity is destroyed like a delicate flower in a nuclear blast.

Don't expect this to make sense. It doesn't, and the TRAs like it that way.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Saved.

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Saved.

I saved, your save.

Jesus saves. And takes half damage.

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

listen bucko... you maybe having 2 whole sexes but I can confirm some of us haven't in a very, very long time.

[–]BISH 4 insightful - 7 fun4 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

People do not have gender. "Gender" is made-up bullshit.

I have a gender.

My gender is cake. Penis cake.

Also, my gender is penis.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

there are exactly two sexes

Some people are intersex, so they don't fit into either of the exactly two sexes.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Some people are intersex, so they don't fit into either of the exactly two sexes.

IFIFY:
Some people are shills, so they don't fit into SaidIt either as they're only here to disrupt.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You interrupt a discussion about the relationship between there being "exactly" two sexes, and there being people who don't fit either sex. This is argument / counter argument on the pyramid of debate.

And you try to drag down the discussion to Ad Hominem or Name-calling.

Your comment is again reported. You do nothing other than try to drag down the discussion on the pyramid of debate. The saidit values are very clear: If a person is caught repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction on the Pyramid of Debate, they will be removed.

I look forward to you being removed.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Good luck with that shillbot.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. We'll see how I go.

[–]Maggotus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Actually Not! Some people are Mentally Ill and cannot fit themselves into either of the exactly 2 sexes. Those people need mental help.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm talking about the physically intersex people. Although certainly the brain has a gender too.

https://www.healthychildren.org/English/health-issues/conditions/genitourinary-tract/Pages/Explaining-Disorders-of-Sex-Development-Intersexuality.aspx#:~:text=What%20is%20a%20Disorder%20of,were%20called%20%22intersex%22%20conditions.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I want to argue out of principle, but it would be pretty dope if humanity evolved a new sex class that was actually fertile from these kinds of people. But as of now, there isn't one, and these people are accurately classified as either male or female with certain developmental disorders affecting the reproductive system. Still, I'd have no qualms calling such a person whatever they wanted to be called. And conceivably their brains could fall somewhere outside of / between masculine and feminine because of hormones in utero, but I've yet to meet someone who can't be basally classified as one or the other, unless their development means they lack any sexuality at all.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

But as of now, there isn't one, and these people are accurately classified as either male or female with certain developmental disorders affecting the reproductive system

Nope. They're in between.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Except they aren't and that isn't offensive? Do you have an actual argument? Someone with CAIS is a male whose body doesn't react to androgens at all, so they don't develop as a phenotypical male. If they did not have that condition, they would have developed as a phenotypical male and not the non-phenotypical male that they are. Sex as a distinction literally only matters in reproduction. If these people could reproduce, it would be a different story; they'd be a sex other than male or female. But literally speaking, they are males or females with a developmental disorder affecting the reproductive system.

Can you at least try and refute one of my points or object to one of my assumptions? That's sort of how an argument works as opposed to a shit-flinging contest.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Do you have an actual argument?

The definition of sex as binary and defined by XX or XY fails.

There are XY females, with CAIS or with Swyer syndrome, there are XXY males, there are XY|XX chimeras who can be intersex, fertile male, fertile female or true hermaphrodites.

Someone with CAIS is a male whose body doesn't react to androgens at all, so they don't develop as a phenotypical male.

That's right. They develop as a female.

Sex as a distinction literally only matters in reproduction. If these people could reproduce, it would be a different story;

If that's where you want to move the bar, it still fails. XX|XY chimeras can be fertile: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6575956/

Here is a case study with a predominantly XY female who was fertile: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2190741/

But all the intersex people who are infertile are still not one sex or the other.

They exist, they are infertile, and they are intersex.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

There are XY females, with CAIS

People with CAIS can't reproduce and they don't have any female internal organs. Swyer syndrome people usually can't either.

That's right. They develop as a female.

Except they aren't female. We can argue about your Swyer syndrome case study but people with CAIS are not female. If anything, they're closer to lacking a sex due to a hormonal issue, without which they would be normal males.

If that's where you want to move the bar, it still fails.

Perhaps it's just getting late but that's irritating, seeing as I have moved no bar anywhere because that was my first comment to you in regards to this subject.

chimeras

Chimeras are a different story. They have some male and some female genes. They're literally a physical combination of both sexes, so you putting them in the same category as people with a typical set of chromosomes and a hormonal disorder is inconsistent.

There are two sexes, but some people who are genetically part one sex and part the other can, in some very, very rare cases be fertile. These people are the only ones with any ambiguity in classification, only because physically, they literally have parts of both sexes.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

People with CAIS can't reproduce and they don't have any female internal organs. Swyer syndrome people usually can't either.

So in the general case they're not female or male?

Or are you claiming that they're male?

Even the fertile female ones?

Chimeras are a different story. They have some male and some female genes. They're literally a physical combination of both sexes, so you putting them in the same category as people with a typical set of chromosomes and a hormonal disorder is inconsistent.

So XX|XY chimeras are not one sex or the other?

These people are the only ones with any ambiguity in classification, only because physically, they literally have parts of both sexes.

Great! We agree. There are people who have ambiguous sex.

So "there are only two sexes" doesn't work for people.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

People with CAIS are male. No one with CAIS has ever been able to reproduce. I don't understand why you insist on putting people with a genetically defined chromosomal sex in the same category as chimeras who have the genes of both sexes. The only people with Swyer Syndrome who can reproduce are chimeras and are both male and female.

So XX|XY chimeras are not one sex or the other?

They're male and female because they have the genes of both sexes.

There are people who have ambiguous sex.

It's really not ambiguous when we can point out the genes of each sex and accurately say they have the genes of both.

So "there are only two sexes" doesn't work for people.

There are two sexes and a very tiny minority of people who literally have the genes of two different people combined into one can have both male and female genes and are technically both male and female.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

People with CAIS are male.

Really?

They've got a vagina. They've got a uterus. They've got no penis.

How is that male?

No one with CAIS has ever been able to reproduce.

Remind me what's that for to do with it? Are you saying people that can't reproduce are not intersex but male?

XY people have been able to reproduce as a fertile female.

I don't understand why you insist on putting people with a genetically defined chromosomal sex in the same category as chimeras who have the genes of both sexes

I'm not sure it's the same category. But they're certainly not precisely male or female.

The only people with Swyer Syndrome who can reproduce are chimeras and are both male and female.

Nope. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2190741/

It's really not ambiguous when we can point out the genes of each sex and accurately say they have the genes of both.

So not one of the two sexes, but both?

So "there are only two sexes" didn't work for people?

There are two sexes and a very tiny minority of people who literally have the genes of two different people combined into one can have both male and female genes and are technically both male and female.

Okay, so they're both sexes. And the XY woman in The case study who had two unassisted pregnancies, and have birth to the daughter was ... Male?