Actually if you think about it, not mutilating confused children is the same as genocide and we are looking at Nuremburg 2.0 here

submitted by iamonlyoneman from old.reddit.com

all 25 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]wristaction 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

GROOMERS SHOULD BE IN DANGER.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I support taking children from mentally ill parents.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

difficulty: the other side of the political aisle thinks you are mentally ill

[–]wristaction 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The other side are psycho perverts preying on children. They belong hanging from streetlamps. They don't have a place in a hypothetical dialectic. They are to be shut up and shut out and removed.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. And they "got" a record number of votes for sniffy uncle joe. It is a considerable portion of the populace

[–]NastyWetSmear 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Man, some of the comments are crazy! There's people in there calling America, Australia... Canada... Not safe for gay people.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

If your primary homicide agent is yourself, no location is safe

[–]NastyWetSmear 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You'll never escape me, me!

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Obviously Iran and Palestine are the true queer homelands

[–]makesyoudownvote 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Iran is for trans, definitely not for queer or gay.

They basically force gay people to undergo transitioning.

I don't know that much about Palestine in this regard. But I have family in Iran.

[–]TheMaharishi 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Trans is simply government sterilization of undesirables. Back in the 60s I think it was. It was common for governments to sterilize retards. The trans movement is just the same thing with more steps. By brainwashing retards into thinking they want it. Because humanists stood up for the retards and governments caught a lot of flak.

[–]makesyoudownvote 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This idea almost makes me support the trans movement. I do think we kinda threw the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to eugenics if I am being 100% honest.

I think we basically have to make a choice soon, either embrace natural selection and make it far easier for children to die before they can grow up to reproduce, or begin embracing eugenics and breed superior humans, eliminate genetic disorders etc.

And despite being fairly pro LGB, I think that comes down to the fact humanity is already over populated. But most first world countries are now suffering diminishing birth rates so maybe we may have to reassess that in the near future. I do think it's technically a disorder, as reproduction is one of the most fundamental necessities of life. If something prevents you or becomes an obstacle to reproduction that's a disorder. This isn't a bad thing. There is no normal. Pretty much everyone has disorders of some sort. But homosexuality is definitely one of them.

[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

At least the danger there matches the reaction they are having.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Groomers should be in danger.

[–]makesyoudownvote 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

This is for them more than us, but I really wish we could at least attempt to have these discussions without using such weighted or leading language.

Take "Trans Rights are human rights". I mean yeah technically. Trans people are human, so any rights they have would be human rights, but then again so are Nazis, murderers, and even wealthy elites.

If I were to say that Elon Musk deserves the right to take anything he wants from anyone at any time, technically thay would be giving a human a right. The problem is that it infringes on the property rights of others. It infringes on their human rights. There is no more fundamental human right than free thought, and when you force people to conceptualize others a certain way you have infringed on these rights. That's what Jordan Peterson was on about with his take on trans rights and the freedom of speech associated with it.

Now to be honorable we should avoid using words like mutilate in any kind of discussion where we actually want to accomplish things. You are free to conceptualize it that way, and obviously you are free to use said language if you want, but it's counter to having a real discussion. They wont use the same language because that's not how they see it. Both parties in good faith need to make an effort to find common language and common ground in having a discussion. They just know that if they ever did, their arguments would mostly fall apart, so the TRAs refuse to.

[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

What common ground do you share with people who groom and mutilate children? I have none. What is yours?

[–]makesyoudownvote 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, we both are human, we both speak English, we both believe in human rights even if we have failed to come together on how to define those rights. We both think murder and theft is wrong. We both drink water, we both sleep, eat, and fuck. We share 99.6% of the same DNA. Do I REALLY need to continue or do you want to remain obtuse to the point?

If the US, France, Japan, England and Germany can all make peace after WW2 and become close allies, I think we can manage people who disagree on how to raise their own children.

I think if we started addressing this we might be able to at least stop for now the whole going behind parents back thing at school. That would be a good first step that I would like to see.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I think a good first step would be to affirm that homosexuals are not stakeholders in the lives of children and that parents who trans their children are criminal abusers. Then we can discuss statutory minimum sentencing and to what extent LGBT organizations can be criminally prosecuted for their interference in public schools.

[–]makesyoudownvote 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There is no good-faith discussion when you are talking about the god of a narciccist's religion in a way which goes against the faith.

[–]makesyoudownvote 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not sure I understand your sentence.

What is "the god of a narcissist's religon" and which faith are you talking about?

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The narcissist worships himself

Troons that you know are troons fall into this camp

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is nothing to discuss with LGBT psychos. They are to be shut up and shut out.

[–]clownworlddropout 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Child abuse is being labeled as child abuse

Oh no! 🙄

Let gay and gender nonconforming kids be gay and gender nonconforming Karen, "trans" isn't a thing—you're just figuratively and literally poisoning kids with your foolish ideology.

[–]Cancelthis 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Take a look at the U.S. government, financing the medical schools and research universities for 80 years, while pushing circumcision of children / genital removal "correction " surgery .

Start right at Herbert Hoover. Move on to Truman and Eisenhower. Then Kennedy and Nixon. And of course, Jimmy Carter.