all 9 comments

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't Cologne Pride the one where lesbians were attacked this year? So pedos are allowed, but lesbians aren't.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hate this.

[–]MoutonelectriqueBland Straight ♀ 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ah, so we can't trust snopes anymore.

In the neighbouring country, The Netherlands, it is known that the paedophilia activists try to get BACK in. There already was some sort of acceptance in the 70s and early 80s (Here's a documentary, it is in Dutch but the accompanying text can be translated by google: https://anderetijden.nl/aflevering/205/Ruimte-voor-de-pedofiel ) . Then there's it was a bit quiet, we had some type of comeback with the organisation Martijn in the nillies becoming louder as they also tried to get into politics ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vereniging_Martijn and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_for_Neighbourly_Love,_Freedom,_and_Diversity ) , and in 2019 Pride Amsterdam had some trouble with #Pedopride activists as Amsterdam Pride wasn't having it but some feminist, Linda Duits, was all 'awwwwh, they have a right to be who they are, the LGBTQ+ rights are just currently too fragile'.

This isn't unfortunately new and I'm getting real sick and tired of the 'that never happens' club. It DID happen in the Netherlands, that fucking political party mentioned above is apparently back, they are still around trying to make paedophilia INCLUDING relationships between adults and children acceptable. Fuck that noise.

Yes, I am a very angry woman.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth)[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

but some feminist, Linda Duits, was all 'awwwwh, they have a right to be who they

what kind of feminism is pro pedophilia?

[–]MoutonelectriqueBland Straight ♀ 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dunno, very libfem? I'm out of the loop regarding feminist circles in the Netherlands. There was some backlash. Not nearly enough in my opinion.

Here's her twitter with a rather disturbing tweet (Roughly translated "Even a remotely feminist is in solidarity with paedophiles. Column in Het Parool [newspaper]" I am quite tired so it's hard to translate sorry) and a link to the specific column. https://mobile.twitter.com/lalalalinder/status/1159087813356347393

[–]MoutonelectriqueBland Straight ♀ 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To make it absolutely clear, I do not believe or think LGBs are all pedo's in disguise as I have seen some conservatives claim. Fuck that noise. If anything in this example, Amsterdam Pride and most people were quite clearly AGAINST it and told them to fuck off.

However, the Netherlands doesn't have the best track record, as I stated in my previous post, paedophiles have been trying to latch on the LGB movement for decades and were somewhat successful back in the 1970's. Current activists pretending it never happens is just false. It's easy to find out it already DID fucking happen.

Even if you agree paedophiles should get help, as I personally do believe (however, how to help is one big fucking mess as we still hardly know how to treat it), there's a big fucking difference between 'I need help' and '#Pedopride'.

Edit: again stupid mistakes. I need more coffee.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even if you agree paedophiles should get help, as I personally do believe (however, how to help is one big fucking mess as we still hardly know how to treat it), there's a big fucking difference between 'I need help' and '#Pedopride'.

Yeah, It's an acquired paraphilia that they tried and are still trying to pass it off as a sexual orientation. Back in the Sexual Liberation movement, later in the Gay Rights movement, and now in non-descript "Queer" Pride. It's quite a stretch and thus a very hard sell no matter the decade.

I think a way to combat this conflation is to constantly ask the advocates and their target audience(progressive liberals) how it is a sexual orientation. A lot of the definitions for sexuality are conveniently, rather circular now. Even the ones that don't seem so at first glance are, like:

a person's identity in relation to the gender or genders to which they are typically attracted; sexual orientation

Sounds simple enough. If gender still meant sex. Too bad it doesn't have any concrete definition anymore. Vagueness allows opportunism. They use that as a Trojan Horse to get in. This is why the opportunists portray definitions as bigoted and exclusionary. Gender-speak has really effed things up in this regard so they love it.

Fortunately, the base word, "sex" is a lot more clear and hopefully it remains so:

the sum of features by which members of species can be divided into two groups—male and female—that complement each other reproductively.

Using this meaning, how does something like pedophilia fit as a SEXuality? Not well. As it is really an "orientation" of age, not sex. And specifically of ages where the target of attraction is the least mentally and physically mature and consequentially least sexually dimorphic. So people should focus on the fact that this attraction is explicitly targeted towards the categorically immature, impressionable, and exploitable demographic. And I don't think most anyone would consider progressing this so-called movement if portrayed in such stark terms.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All the fact check sites seem to be captured by blue check liberals. It was obvious how they started going crazy with fact checks which were blatantly false against Bernie Sanders then they just moved over to being propaganda laundering devices. They likely view the whole "MAP pride flag" thing purely as a right wing troll against the poor trans people so just ignore the fact that they are just defending pedos.

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

If this comment is being added for sites which cannot be usefully archived - for example, video hosts or an existing archive site - please let the Moderators know by sending ModMail. REPLIES TO THIS COMMENT ARE NOT SEEN BY MODS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.