LGB ErasureWe are lesbians together

submitted by ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah from i.imgur.com

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]hufflepuff-poet 34 insightful - 18 fun34 insightful - 17 fun35 insightful - 18 fun -  (0 children)

Well, he and his "trans gf" are gay together.... I'll give him that. Just not in the way he wants to be 😭

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 20 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

This is your 15-year-old brain on trans

[–]hufflepuff-poet 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And he actually believes trans delusions are reality. This makes me sad for this kid and all the other youth sucked up into this....they genuinely believe that a man can become a woman and that heterosexual sex can be "gay" just because one of the people has a gender identity. How are these kids gonna navigate the actual world?! Someone take that VR headset from this kid pls and toss him outside with some grass and normie friends!

[–]DimDroog 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope he isn't taking hormones or puberty blockers.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Where do you find all of your links?

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Twitter and Reddit for the most part

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Question for those who believe in gender ideology: if my partner and I are both biologically female and we do not believe in gender ideology or that we have gender identities, meaning we accept that we’re female and believe (like most the world) that that alone (nothing more and nothing less) makes us women, what is our relationship? Is it gay/lesbian? Especially if we don’t feel ourselves to be playing the “social role of a woman.” What even is the social role of a woman in a lesbian relationship? Sounds like the inverse of asking who the man is? We know we’re unambiguously biologically female and everyone else can and does easily discern that too, and treats us accordingly.

I guess the threshold question is, under gender ideology, what is each of is considered? Are we cis? Are we non-binary? My partner only buys men’s clothes and doesn’t feel comfortable in clothing from women’s clothing departments. What then?

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 18 insightful - 13 fun18 insightful - 12 fun19 insightful - 13 fun -  (0 children)

You're white supremacists who need to suck girl dick, bigots.

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 5 fun15 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

According to TRA logic you'd both be agender as opposed to nonbinary. Because you specified that you and your partner do not have gender identities. Nonbinary refers to someone who has a gender identity that falls outside of the 'boundaries' of male and female, whether that be a mix of the two or an in between along a 'spectrum'. Agender on the other hand refers to the absence of a gender identity. Which, since you are both 'non men' agenders in a relationship, would make both of you pansexual. It is now a 'queer' relationship.

I wish I didn't know all of this. But I honestly think it's important to know how they think because then it's much easier to poke holes in their arguments.

For example: By their logic everyone except the most gender conforming individuals would also be agender. They say part of 'cis privilege' is never thinking about your gender. That if you think about your gender and question it, you are not cis. But then they go and make an identity for those who don't care about their gender. The aforementioned logic about 'cis privilege' has been thrown out the window. Because now every 'cis' person is agender due to the absence of a gender identity. Which is an oxymoron by their own definitions.

[–]reluctant_commenter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wish I didn't know all of this. But I honestly think it's important to know how they think because then it's much easier to poke holes in their arguments.

Agreed. To that argument I would counter: "You're not allowed to say how someone else identifies, only they can say that." TRAs believe that, or claim to believe that. So many of their beliefs are logically inconsistent, and it's important to point out when they are.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This would a good question to put in s/GCdebatesQT also. There are not too many true believers here. Just be aware there can be disingenuous users there who try to talk one around in circles to exhaust energy and waste time.

[–]Mermer 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to TRA's logic you can't be lesbians AND women (unless you're a tim). Gay automatically equals gender special. But you can choose for yourself ☺️😜