you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]julesburm1891 51 insightful - 2 fun51 insightful - 1 fun52 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The Joan of Arc thing makes me really angry. She saw herself being a woman as central to being chosen by God. (A woman arising from the marshes of Lorraine was a popular belief in France during her lifetime.) Just because she preferred “men’s” clothes (which were basically just leggings) and wasn’t afraid to fight, doesn’t make her trans.

[–]MezozoicGayoldschool gay 43 insightful - 11 fun43 insightful - 10 fun44 insightful - 11 fun -  (2 children)

Jeanne d'Arc was wearing "feminine" cloths by todays standarts, but those were "masculine" cloths back then. So it is even more weird with their own description of femininity and masculinity.

JK Rowling published under men's name too, so her books are taken seriously. I guess she is trans now and all attacks on her are just transphobia.

[–][deleted] 31 insightful - 4 fun31 insightful - 3 fun32 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

You joke, but I've seen some people speculate that JKR is secretly trans and all her criticism of extreme trans activism is just internalized transphobia. An incredibly niche conspiracy theory, but one that just shows how far the denial goes in some of them.

[–]denverkrisMy pronouns are Vodka?/Yes!/please 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

But remember, being trans doesn't have anything to do with how feminine or masculine someone is <insert eyeroll>.