all 10 comments

[–]ThiccDropkickGay 18 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I prefer to say both sexes but yours is definitely an improvement over the original aha

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Wikipedia is an untrustworthy site.

[–]artetolife 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

That's not wikipedia

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wikipedia isn't really better: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisexuality

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Wikipedia can be trustworthy, if there a lot of source links. However, with LGBTQ+ articles, if you check - most links are to someones opinion or news paper or site, almost never to something actually legit.

[–]julesburm1891 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Doing the lord’s work.

[–]AnokiFrench 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That’s a better definition

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If it wasn't meant to mean "both genders", there wouldn't ever have been the prefix "bi" in the name.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly, I'm still mad about the blue stripe above the flag. It makes it look like the flag is supposed to have a blue stripe that says "bisexuality" on the top