I used to hate /r/askgaybros, but lately they give me hope that the whole LGB people haven't gone crazy

submitted by artetolife from old.reddit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LushCanopy 36 insightful - 2 fun36 insightful - 1 fun37 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Why is the trans cult always attacking lesbians and gays about their sexuality? A lot of straight men are transphobic as fuck lol, but they never get called out for their "genital preference".

[–]Tikiri 28 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 0 fun29 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I’ve wondered about this a lot, as well. I think partly it’s because straight men hold more power than anyone else, anywhere in the world, and going after them can badly backfire against their movement. So they attack LGB people who have much less power, in comparison. Then again, so many transwomen are straight men who go after lesbians (for the “validation” by the looks of it), and the rest are gay men, so they attack LGB people for rejecting their advances. I think it all stems from a volatile mix of acute frustration and intense narcissism in the trans people who do go on attack mode. Not all do, from what I’ve seen, but the few sane, reasonable trans people I’ve interacted with online told me they get doxxed, harassed and threatened like everyone else. They don’t want anything to do with the Transcult but they’re scared to say anything too.

[–]divingrightintowork 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Women are scared that transwomen will kill them, transwomen are scared that men will kill them.

[–]notdelusionalbased faggot 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I see it in a somewhat different perspective. Homosexual relations have an understanding of sameness that hetero relations do not have. For example, males are capable of relating to each other in ways that males and females cannot do together and vice versa. This frustrates the transgender concept because it is unable to use the cover of opposite sex unrelatability. In other words, it's easier to fool a person into believing that actual transformation to the sex opposite of the observer is possible.

On a side note I dare say that practicing the transgender concept is not sane nor reasonable. Any participation in it is being part of the cult.

[–]Tikiri 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Definitely! I think that’s part of why the OP is so angry - I think he feels he’s being rejected by the very members of his own community because they don’t buy his GenderWooWoo. He’s a gay man whose identity is being rejected by other gay men. I’m a straight woman so I could be totally misreading it, but that’s what came across in his post.

[–]fuck_reddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yep, I think you've hit the nail on the head. One of the threads on AGB that was asserting "trans men are men" was filled with normal gay guys asking these trans "guys" to define manhood. When these trans guys did, it was abundantly clear that they weren't guys and had a fetishist/homophobic/etc. view of gay guys. A straight guy, however, is probably less certain (or able to assert) what womanhood is. It infuriates them that their sexual targets so swiftly and easily expose their false-persona.

[–]notdelusionalbased faggot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My definition of manhood is the shared experience of adult males. Our physical bodies are our human basis, so body parts like genitals matter. For example, every guy can relate to one another what it's like to have a dick and balls, and that has social consequences. I wouldn't expect a female to be able to fully understand its scope. I suspect there remain many unknowns related to Y chromosome gene expression which also contribute to the male body shared experience--hormones are likely being given far too much prominence in the equation.

The "trans X ARE X" dogma is a stubborn insistence that details don't matter. It's annoyingly anti-science.

[–]fuck_reddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah. Hormones being used to "make someone" the opposite sex is like putting a bandaid on a bullet wound, the "damage" of puberty and nearly two decades of development is already there. Also, administering hormones/blockers at a young age doesn't change much either, most of the effort is just preventing what would naturally happen, not promoting the opposite. Also there's so much development that occurs pre-puberty that it's just not really possible to change sexes.