you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]forwardback 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I second your concern. When the Dems said they supported the gender movement, I believed them. By rules and practices, legislation, or executive orders, we're going to see the changing of language and the loss of most (everything?) for which women fought so hard.

[–]MezozoicGay 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Republicans tried to please MRA and to remove all women rights, but always were failing and only partially limiting women. Now Democrats came and "look how Dad is doing this" and showing how to do it?

Looks like this parody is not a parody, but a statement of a fact: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev373c7wSRg

[–]Silverhatband 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So, Dems: "Hold my beer..."?

[–]MezozoicGay 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly.

[–]Silverhatband 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Political persons within federal agencies and departments can create administration changes that will carry profound repercussions legally. This is a fact Not to be taken lightly! Especially, as the new House rules establishes the Office of Diversity and Inclusion; better believe political interests will be stacked in agency positions. This may be even more detrimental than Supreme Court stacking. Civics. The more you know...