you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yousaythosethings 36 insightful - 1 fun36 insightful - 0 fun37 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ahem, Margaret Atwood. . . .

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 59 insightful - 1 fun59 insightful - 0 fun60 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's amazing how a writer who is mostly famous for a dystopia novel about the subjugation of one sex through their reproductive capacity ends up being one of the morons who think that since certain fishes can change sex, then human sex is irrelevant.

And all of that to kiss some men's ass.

I lost every kind of respect I had in a single tweet. Talk about disappointment.

[–]MezozoicGay 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe those books were just her fantasies and dreams, not critique?

[–]Aquadog 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She was always adamant that it was speculative fiction and not science fiction though.