all 7 comments

[–]oofreesouloo 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't understand this peoples' logic. Oh, wait. There's none.

[–]Sun_bear 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Facial hairs, strong jaws and 'masculine' features on women of colour? Erm... No? Do these people read this ridiculous shit that they write? I don't even know where to begin - do I point out women are more than their looks? That 'women of colour' is an incredibly diverse group? That there exist within all races women who look more dainty and women who look more masculine? That this statement is super racist and insulting? That white beauty standards are deeply regressive and anti-feminist? That I have never in my life mistaken a woman for a man, regardless of what race they are? That even if a woman who looked like a man did exist they would still be a fucking woman?

[–]jkfinn 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So, radical feminists are called “Womanhood” and this white Womanhood is founded on racism toward black women founded on reading black women as males. This is what you call writing’s that inimical to reason, history, and feminism. It may sound “smart” to the passing reader, who thinks the second wave occurred in the 18th century, but it’s absolute incoherence based on junk which makes nonsense way too polite a term.

[–]GConly 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's just ridiculous. For a start plenty of white women get facial hair. I spend half my grooming time yanking out my PCOS moustache.

[–]sisterinsomnia 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He is the real racist and sexist bigot there, perhaps one of those men (if he identifies as a man) who has found this outlet for his hatred of women in general: Bash TERVEN.

He denigrates the beauty of women of color and, indeed, the beauty of any woman with sculpted cheek bones and so on. He defines what masculine features might be himself in that tweet which shows his clear misogyny. In this case it is directed both at all women of color and at all gender critical women.

[–]materialrealityplz 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The trans movement is so extremely superficial. How you look defines your sex, and even though they spout 'spectrum' bullshit, they only seem to see a binary. :P

[–]Complicated-Spirit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is yet another example of someone trying to be woke and just exposing how narrow-minded and racist they themselves really are.

Expressing how you’re soooooooooo progressive and woke by describing how WOC look alike and also resemble TiMs, what with their facial hair and strong jawlines, is simply such an astounding display of stupidity that I can’t really find anything to compare it to.