you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (11 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Realwoman 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    But why? Wtf? Also, isn't sex discrimination federally prohibited?

    [–]kwallio 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    The whole thing is bizarre. The woke crowd is behind this on the idea that this will allow affirmative action again in CA. So that marginalized groups can receive preferential treatment in hiring, etc. This will blow up ridiculously in their faces in practice, of course.

    [–]malleus_maleficarum 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I'm sort of being a wiseass here, but, have they not considered that self-id provides an instant loophole. "Oh whoops well I now identify as agender. Your move." "How dare you assume I'm a woman just by looking at me!" etc.

    [–]joy1090 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Is that ACA 5? Sorry I don't know.

    [–]Dragonerne 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes

    [–]loq453 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Only discrimination based on sex, or all discrimination.

    [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin

    [–]loq453 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Does this include also private employers, because a lot of racism will come to surface.

    [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You'd have to ask someone more knowledgable than me, but not to my knowledge.