About the origins of the word "gender"

submitted by BiologyIsReal from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

I’m waiting for you to prove everyone else has the exact same hang up you have. You think you can just say that no child would ever say something super common but I gotta give you a study or a thesis?

You’re so full of shit lol

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

I'm not surprised you consider a kids' show or book to be a study or thesis.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

You’re the one saying kids shows and books prove that no child could ever say the words ‘my mum found out the sex of her baby’ and that google images are how everyone who speaks English thinks sex only ever means intercourse.

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

What? No, I'm saying show me an example of a child saying the sentence you made up. You can criticise how disagreeable you find my evidence, but it still beats literally no evidence at all, which is all you've provided so far.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

Why when you’ll just turn around and say my anecdote doesn’t count? How would a child’s book prove that children are capable of understanding that sex has multiple meanings even when you aren’t? What is the point of providing you with proof you are wrong when you have ignored paragraphs and paragraphs of it from MT and BIR?

Calling your faulty proofs evidence doesn’t make it evidence.

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

Every reply of yours just obfuscates from your lack of evidence. You coming up with a random sentence & then making appeals to personal incredulity is not evidence. The sentence has to come from an external source in order for it to be evidence. I'm still waiting.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

Like your ‘evidence’ of google images and a claim you cannot back up of ‘nobody does that’ are evidence we should have just taken as gospel?

Grow up ya gronk

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

You can bash the evidence I've provided all you want, but it will always beat your lack of evidence, sorry.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Sure pal. Dodgy evidence beats common sense every time. You truly know how every single English speaker thinks about the word sex.

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Your opinion of my evidence is less than valueless without any counter evidence on your part. Google Image results ≠ my opinion btw, you're conflating evidence with opinion again.