About the origins of the word "gender"

submitted by BiologyIsReal from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

What? No, I'm saying show me an example of a child saying the sentence you made up. You can criticise how disagreeable you find my evidence, but it still beats literally no evidence at all, which is all you've provided so far.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

Why when you’ll just turn around and say my anecdote doesn’t count? How would a child’s book prove that children are capable of understanding that sex has multiple meanings even when you aren’t? What is the point of providing you with proof you are wrong when you have ignored paragraphs and paragraphs of it from MT and BIR?

Calling your faulty proofs evidence doesn’t make it evidence.

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

Every reply of yours just obfuscates from your lack of evidence. You coming up with a random sentence & then making appeals to personal incredulity is not evidence. The sentence has to come from an external source in order for it to be evidence. I'm still waiting.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

Like your ‘evidence’ of google images and a claim you cannot back up of ‘nobody does that’ are evidence we should have just taken as gospel?

Grow up ya gronk

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

You can bash the evidence I've provided all you want, but it will always beat your lack of evidence, sorry.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Sure pal. Dodgy evidence beats common sense every time. You truly know how every single English speaker thinks about the word sex.

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Your opinion of my evidence is less than valueless without any counter evidence on your part. Google Image results ≠ my opinion btw, you're conflating evidence with opinion again.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

You literally think your opinion is a universal thing amongst all English language speakers even when English speakers are telling you they do not use the word that way.

I might as well hand evidence to a cactus for all the good it will do. Now leave me be and enjoy your mighty reign as king of the feminists already🙄

[–]SnowAssMan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

You're still repeating yourself & you're still unable to produce any evidence to back up any of the claims you've made. Take a break from the excuses & ad hominems & produce evidence for once.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Says the one who accused me of gaslighting him lmao. Grow up and give it up. It’s pathetic and really disingenuous to claim we need proof that you do not speak for all English speakers. Use your head instead of arguing from your offence at being disagreed with.