This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

Meta: Moderation and the rules

submitted by circlingmyownvoid2 from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (47 children)

Months and months ago now. Essentially, masks told me that I am barely human/cruel/morally a failure/a bad person because I did not assist a rapist whose nose I broke and because if in the situation again, I would still maim the rapist and not help. Escaping an attacker you manage to injure is a moral failing of women and they are barely human if they don’t stop to offer aid after kicking a man who forced his penis into her body, in the nuts. He never apologised or admitted this is a disgusting display of hatred for women and resounding support for rapists to be protected from consequences of their choice to be a rapist. He has made zero effort to apologise for deliberately dehumanising me and victim blaming me. In fact he doubled down. And will likely throw a tantrum over my use of the term ‘he’.

The audacity and misogyny it takes to make this thread after he has done that is fucking infinite.

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus Christ, I thought this thread was ridicoulous because I know how big of a theatrics-enthusiast performer mask is. But this comment you just wrote puts a completely different level of disgusting hypochrisy on the situation.

I really have no word to describe just how violently disgusted I am by the idea that there are people who think that rape victims have any obligation towards their rapists. Or that they need to put themselves even in potential more danger because the poor souls need help.

And here I thought that forcing female rape victims to call their trans rapist "she" was bad: this is even worse. Ugh.

But yeah, of course, dehumanization is only something important when it' s done to the "right" people and for the "right" reasons. Calling out a rape victim for trying to save herself from her rapist, on the other hand, is perfectly fine.

[–]circlingmyownvoid2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (45 children)

That’s not what I said.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (44 children)

Really masks? Go pull up the quotes.

[–]circlingmyownvoid2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (43 children)

Go ahead. Show everyone how I very much didn’t say that.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (42 children)

Fine I’ll end with this. It’s not about rape it’s about people. If you could let someone bleed out without calling 911, I fundamentally can’t understand your lack of respect for life.

You fundamentally cannot understand my lack of respect for someone who’s lack of respect led them to R A P I N G me. You put my morals on trial out of everyone’s in that situations and you think that’s normal or okay?

[–][deleted]  (27 children)

[removed]

    [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

    Tempting, but I think the rest of the community should be able to decide that too. Not a public trial or anything, but like, a message to bir or peaking sort of deal.

    [–][deleted]  (25 children)

    [removed]

      [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      I don’t disagree that masks has been a frequently troublesome user, and in my experience has yet to make a good faith argument. I just don’t wanna have the power to have someone banned. I’d rather it wasn’t my say so.

      [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      I feel like this is a microcosm of the whole set of problems this sub is about, as well as all the GC subs. Were you banned as "Catbug"?

      [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

      I think you need to stop telling Houseplant what she has to do.

      [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

      I made 1 suggestion to her. I'm discussing the nature of this cesspool with her. CMOV2 has continually said that cmov2 is forbidden to discuss the matter but then often in the same sentence continues to make excuses for inexcusable behavior. That seems like laughing at the rules to me. I think I need to point out that the problem is CMOV2's doubling down on inexcusable behavior which, along with queztelwhateverthemod'snameis' in action caused catbug to leave. It's almost like CMOV2's behavior is no different that the rest of the TRAs behavior, make everything so intolerable so that they are all that is left. If you want to assist CMOV2 in making this place intolerable, go right ahead. I think I suggested to you what you should do if I'm the problem here.

      [–]circlingmyownvoid2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

      I still don’t understand it but that doesn’t mean I am saying you are wrong or blameworthy.

      [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      It means that you are so incapable of empathising with a woman that you questioned her morals when there was a rapist. The morals you found objectionable enough to argue about were the morals of the raped woman.

      It implies that I am precisely wrong and blameworthy, and reprehensible for not performing what you perceive as a moral duty.

      You are so incapable of empathising with a woman that you enforced your moral framework onto how she escaped a rape to say she did not perform her duty. And you’re still doing it.

      [–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

      So if a "cis" man raped you, and he ended up hurt in your attempt to get away from him, you would stay there even if he could hurt you more because helping an injured rapist out is more ethical than saving yourself?

      How about those "cis" men you keep saying that assaulted you in restrooms: would you feel any duty to help them if, in an attempt to save yourself, you had managed to hurt them?

      [–]circlingmyownvoid2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

      Me personally? Yes. But I realize that’s an unreasonable standard and wouldn’t demand anyone else do the same.

      [–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      And yet, even if you consider it an unreasonable standard, you had no problem spending the entirety of a thread "subtly" implying that anyone who doesn' t help their rapist is a heartless, horrible, immoral human being? And when you were called out on it you either doubled down or pretended that you never supported that position.

      [–]circlingmyownvoid2[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

      I’m done talking about it.

      Read what I just wrote. I’m not holding anyone else to the standard of care I put on myself.