But then it's the same TQ belief, a man says he is a woman because he says he is, or a woman says she is a man because she says she is, and in the acting as a fictional character whose sex doesn't match the sex of the one who acts as it, a man says he is acting as a woman and therefore is a woman for the time being, and a woman says she is acting as a man and therefore is a man for the time being until the acting is over. There is no difference. "Trans men" and "trans women" are just playing as fictional characters, for years instead of a few minutes or hours. The fictional characters are just a version of them whose sex they think does not match their own sex. They create a fictional version of themselves who they think is the opposite sex, and act as it, and believe they are that for years. They act as that fictional version of themselves whose sex they think doesn't match their own. No difference.

That's why: If I see a male acting as a "female" character, I'll say that character is a male in that story because a male is acting as it, it is not a "female". But a male version of that "female" character people imagined because a male is acting as it.

And if a female acts as a "male" character, then I'll say the character is not male anymore. It is a female version of the "male" character the authors and producers imagined before, but because a female is acting as it, the character is also female.

It just makes no sense for a male to act as a "female" character, or for a female to act as a "male" character. There's just no way I can accept someone with a vagina is a "male" or someone with a penis is a "female" in any setting. Just like I can't accept someone white acting as a "black" character, they are white, and in that "setting" the character is also the white version of the black character that was first imagined, because a white individual is acting as it.

I'm .. so frustrated, wow. :((