all 17 comments

[–]Musky 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ed posted mine, I posted his. Turnaround is fair play. The convict mind simply cannot comprehend.

[–]detty 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's exactly what you did to /u/Musky back in August. And now you cry about getting the exact same treatment.

You're so pathetic, Feddy.

[–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He did it again yesterday, so I took the website he used and slapped his number in there instead.

[–]Mcheetah 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You use Brave? Ew. Why?? It's just Chrome controlled opposition. They don't protect you from crap. Even Opera and Vivaldi are less fake than them.

Either way, why would you Streisand Effect yourself like this? No one even knows who you are on here.

[–]SisterTwisters 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No one even knows who you are on here

Not anymore not since musky doxxed me.

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I asked him to delete the 'topic' immediately afterward, and he replied with 'nope' he was mad you posted a note about him. Ya'll need to kiss and make up.

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Chat resets itself every eight hours and doesn't keep logs, so no one would ever have known this unless someone screenshotted it and posted it to the forum.

...that someone, in this case, being you.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Link don't work

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[removed]

    [–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Actually the op might be a fed, I realized the link doesn't work for me cuz my antivirus blocked it. Just a warning to anyone trying to click it.

    [–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    We know you're a Fed. Who you think you're kidding? lol

    [–]ExplodingToasterOven 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    lol! Well, in the old days I'd say this might open you up to a lot of crank calls. But these days most people are so asocial, a text message or two is likely all you'll get. Or maybe a dick pic like this one. ;) https://www.loc.gov/resource/cph.3a53306/

    [–]neolib 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    My view on the controversial topic of doxxing:

    Name, age (in years), general occupation (without company name), city of residence - ok

    Physical address, phone number, SSN, passport scan, birth date, company name - not ok

    In this case phone number was shared, and therefore this is not ok.

    [–]AAAAAASSSSSSSSDDDDDD 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    My view on the controversial topic of doxxing:

    my view on doxxing is that doxxing is a criminal offense.

    [–]neolib 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I asked anonchatgpt.com:

    What is legality of doxxing in United States in a case when it means connecting a real name to an anonymous social media account, without harassment?

    In the United States, doxxing is not explicitly illegal in most cases. However, it can potentially lead to legal consequences if it involves harassment, threats, or other illegal activity. Connecting a real name to an anonymous social media account without engaging in harassment may not be illegal per se, but it could still have negative consequences for the individual being doxxed, such as loss of privacy and potential harm to their reputation.

    In some cases, doxxing could potentially violate state laws regarding privacy, harassment, or cyberstalking. Additionally, some online platforms have their own terms of service that prohibit doxxing and could result in the user being banned or facing legal action.

    Overall, while the legality of doxxing in the specific case mentioned may depend on the circumstances and laws of the jurisdiction where it occurs, it is generally best to avoid engaging in this behavior to protect the privacy and well-being of individuals online.

    [–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Always doxx liberals but try to protect good peoples info

    [–]neolib 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I doubt just mentioning someone's name online is a criminal offense.