We're not grooming the kids, it's valid and wholesome for Planne Parenthood to give them a 30 minute consult and approve cross-sex hormones, even if they're mentally challenged!

submitted by iamonlyoneman from 12ft.io

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Apparently you have some personal, non-standard definition of "grooming." I'd love to hear it.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Would you? Here, try this on for size:

To prepare, as for a specific position or purpose

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That's a definition that's rapidly becoming archiac, the same way people no longer use "gay" to mean "happy" or "pussy" to mean "cat." If you said you were grooming an employee in 1970, people would nod and say "good." If you said the same thing today, they'd look at you in shock.

WebMD's definition of "sexual grooming" is "when a sexual predator builds a relationship with a child or adult to abuse and exploit them. They build trust but use it to control, isolate, and abuse their victims emotionally, physically, and sexually."

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So it's not a relationship, between the babykiller and the autistic child patient who gets put on hormones, and it's not abuse and exploitation (for profit) it's just wholesome non-grooming.

Grooming doesn't have to be about sex. Don't use shit dictionaries.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sexual grooming is about sex. And you obviously aren't accusing the doctors of grooming children for a future as Planned Parenthood doctors. And you aren't accusing them of brushing the children's hair or picking fleas off their backs. When you call them "groomers," you're trying to invoke the imagery of sexual groomers, who start romantic relationships with minors in order to fuck them later.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

when i change definitions and craft a luxurious strawman for your argument to reside in, you lose. Check and MATE!

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What the fuck are you smoking? Not only did that make absolutely no sense, it was barely even in English.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

k