Check out all these jews who work for the White House

submitted by Oyveygoyim from download.monin.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheMaharishi 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

Hitler was backed by banker Jews. Prescott Bush, a well known Jew puppet, was even convicted of trading with the enemy.

[–]MagicMike 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

These are facts. IBM also made a fortune from the Nazis.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

No, not facts. Such a childish infantile way of viewing the world - "backed", they "backed" him.

No, asshole, Hitler was backed by the SS and SA and Wehrmacht, that was sufficient backing for him. Anyone else's decision to back or not back him is completely irrelevant to the outcomes recorded in history.

[–]MagicMike 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/04/hitlers-willing-business-partners/303146/

Here ya go, bug wit.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yeah so what, the German government had access to industries. That doesn't prove any of your stupid antisemitc conspiracist nonsense. Putin also had access to industries until they sanctioned him. Xi today has access to industries....does that mean conspiracy theories about ruzzia and China are true by default? Of course not

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Each of the 3 superstates knows that they cannot conquer either of the other two. So like a teepee or 3 shafts of corn tied together, they prop each other up. The uniting factor then is membership in one or more of the international power groups, like the Bilderbergers or the City of London. At the very top are the bankers, the ones who control everything because they run the financials. These banksters, exposed by Henry Ford years ago, are invariably (((international))).

For fun, here’s Jamie Diman’s boss: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanford_I._Weill

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Except all that is your fake internet story. And has no bearing on reality, at all.

Also, Jamie Dimon is ceo and board chair at chase. Basically Logan Roy.

The person you linked is board chair at a different company, citi. It doesn't even make sense. It doesn't even seem like you have spent even five seconds validating your stupid fake internet story

Yet you express it with such blowhard asshattery it's mind-blowing. The sheer dunning kruger power of a retard at work

Remember when you thought Hitler having access to industries was proof of your fake worldview

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

“ While at American Express, Weill began grooming his newest protégé, Jamie Dimon, the future CEO of JPMorgan Chase.”

From the link.

There ya go.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You wrote

For fun, here’s Jamie Diman’s boss

Which was untrue

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

‘grooming’

Heh, heh, heh….

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[removed]

    [–]Vulptex[A] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    This borders on advocating violence. I'm removing it to appease saidit's providers, which have shut it down in the past over accusations of things like this. Please be more careful in the future.

    [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Are you willing to share which providers you're referring to? I would like to enquire with them why they find OPs like this (and the many many similar) to be okay and not deserving of pulling service

    [–]Oyveygoyim[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Shut it down! The goyim know!

    [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    I'm not involved with operating saidit, I just know it's been an issue in the past. Being strict about violence seems to keep them satisfied. For now.

    [–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Okay so to be clear, is it that you're unaware of the provider names, or you're unwilling to share them?

    And why, in your opinion, are OP posts like this one okay and not deserving of pulling service? If you're willing to briefly explain. Obviously you're aware of some external decision makers who have a problem with interpreted violence but they have no problem whatsoever with overt antisemitism and hate speech. Thanks

    [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't know who the providers are, other than CloudFlare. But I do know what they've done, and what keeps them satisfied.

    You can't expect me to answer why they're okay with what they are. If I had to guess it has everything to do with liability.