all 29 comments

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

The child will be thankful to be alive.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't care. Not worth the cost of our country.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This country ceased to exist the moment they overthrew Donald Trump for this illegal immoral imperialist terrorist yt supremacist war for oil against the real winner of both world wars who is going to win the next world war that the greedy imperialist West incited against it.

[–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The people whose mothers never wanted them, are born into poverty and are abused and/or neglected, and have no actual family

Are you talking about yourself?

[–]JewsAreOfColor 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If elchupacabra was my son, I would beat him senseless.

Nell Carter was right to handle those little honky brats on her show with the use of force because that’s the only way to deal with those little honky brats.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol. Well I didn't get aborted even though it was legal, so I was wanted to some extent.

And if I was aborted ¯_ (ツ)_/¯ that's sort of how it is when you're a fetus. If your mom wants to give you life, you're lucky. If not, raw deal.

That's how it is when you're a helpless parasite in someone's body, as we all once were. I think the idea of having that level of a lack of control is terrifying to a lot of people, and the fear pushes them to feel entitled. No one is entitled to being carefully developed in someone else's body. Consider yourself lucky because you were. As was everyone else who's here to argue this point.

It's genuinely pathetic watching people screech for control over a phase of life that only the mother will ever have control over, no matter what anyone does or legislates. If she's determined enough to not give you life, she could just take a coat hanger to you, take any number of harmful substances, or give birth to you in secret and crack your fragile skull like an egg before you even taste air.

Yet anti-abortion people are trying to punish females who are too nice to do that? Would you rather be killed quickly by some drug before you even have a brain, or would you like to be a fully-formed human infant getting the emerging part of your skull slammed on the corner of some ghetto bathroom countertop? Or getting your neck snapped after feeling the 5 seconds of cold emptiness that is all you've ever experienced in the world?

Everyone, especially people who are anti-abortion, should feel grateful that their own mothers allowed them to live and even took care of them when they were helpless worms. And everyone should consider themselves lucky that most females would much rather take a pill early on to abort an embryo than violently end the life of a fully-formed human infant.

Trying helplessly to pass laws to punish the nice ones who want to make it a quick process and end it early before it can even feel pain* is a pathetic way to try and retroactively regain control over that phase of their lives instead of being grateful for being created and taken care of when they were a parasite and later a worm. And they should be grateful on behalf of humanity that so many females would rather take the merciful route instead of trying to make that harder for them, because the violent option still remains and always will.

There's no way to escape from the fact that the fetus has no control over whether or not it's born and whether or not it's taken care of. And trying to restrict the females who have any mercy in their souls from aborting some cells that could potentially become a human being who walks among us is firstly ungrateful, and secondly is retarded because now they can either end it violently, or have some kid they don't want, refuse to raise it, and then send it in all its illiterate, mouth-breathing glory to wreak havoc on the world around it.

*There's no point in arguing whether a blastocyst can feel pain when scientists can't even agree that fully-formed adult fish can; and again, even if they can, it's nothing compared to the pain a fully-formed human infant would experience being killed, especially considering the psychological factor of it knowing nothing but pain and hate in the short time it experienced the world.

[–]Evola 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Alright then from a pure pragmatic point of view if for some reason you could wave a magic wand and make every single women that's pregnant come to term then it wouldn't take long for traditional gender roles to reinstate themselves just on the shame of it alone. 97% of abortions are matters of convince and every time a woman couples with a new man she's more likely to divorce exponential. So if you force a women who wants to have sex into childbirth and marriage then with it being the first man that's the best chance for the child not to grow up in a single mother household. Single parenthood by the way is the biggest factor for poor economic outcomes, criminal behaviour and social degeneracy.

You claim you don't want children to grow up poor but if you can prevent children growing up with half a family then you can give it twice the chance.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Good luck legislating that. And two ghetto retards are worse than one.

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It was rhetoric you jungle fucktard.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, you shut the fuck up and stay shut up until the Black man tells you to speak, you fucking cracker piece of shit. The Black man was put on this earth to put you in your place, and that place is a concentration camp. You built them to exterminate every race that is superior to yours, which is every other race, now we’re going to take it over and use it to stop you from killing anyone else. You have crossed the line way too many times to be given the benefit of the doubt ever again. The uKKKrainiaNAZI invasion and occupation of the Donbass and terrorism against the ethnic Russians who are indigenous to it was the last straw.

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, and?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Think of a practical solution nigger

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At least it beats another dumb inbred honky tranny freak shooting Black men at a goy school.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly, most people are fucked up - so I don't know why people are so selfish and self-centered to think that they are worthy of spawning a child that has any chance of being any better than they are. Since most folks are not ideal candidates to improve the species, it only seems logical that they might as well adopt a child that actually needs help than to make another with your genes that will also need help. I can't think of anything more selfless and noble than adopting an existing orphan child and to save it from the evil predatory system (assuming it hasn't already been fucked up by it).

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–]UbiquitousCultOfSelf 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Masterful eugenics.
Are you also going to take care of the disabled vets?
The useless eaters?
Elderly?
Anyone with a genetically inherited undesirable trait?
Brown eyes?
Heck of a plan, fuhrer.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Easily burned skin and small penises are undesirable character traits.

[–]UbiquitousCultOfSelf 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So now you're a cannibal of another sort? You eat people? Brah, cut the shift out.
Do your people(the Will and Graces) go through menopause? You'll have a chance then.
Or, of course, turn to G-d and let the waters of life and change pour over you to become the man He wants you to be.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's funny being angrily called Hitler on this site.

Did I say "kill all undesirables" or did I say "let people who don't want kids and will fuck them up and let them fuck up our country not have them"?

[–]UbiquitousCultOfSelf 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It was meant to be funny, not angrily.

So here's a thought experiment to try out,
In a timeline where there is no God and evolution is the soup de jour, and social darwinism, blah blah blah such that two factors determine the fate of whole societies and possibly even the fate of the planet, those two being: environment (one's upbringing and circumstances) and nurture. The ol' nature vs nurture, but rather nature and nurture being two opposite poles each pulling and giving in their own way.

What would happen if there were a great inventor or savior (in the sense of one who would cure cancer, etc) but we decided as a society, to abort those who "would have an f'ed up life"?
Many books, movies, plays would not be made because it's in the "crucible of the fire" that our medal of our character is tested.

Look to the "natural world". What would happen if, every time you saw a chrysalis you stepped on it? Oh the horror of a world without butterflies!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Alright lol.

Yeah but I don't want to abort every single person who could possibly have a fucked up life. I want their mothers to be able to abort them if they don't want them, and the result will be fewer fucked up people.

People who don't struggle with poverty etc. growing up can still have great character. And such struggles can make the character of the people who suffer therm worse as they are forced to compromise their morals to survive.

Every person who is born into a fucked up situation is not a chrysalis destined to become a butterfly. More likely, they are destined to become a menace to society.

If suffering is so valuable, should we make people suffer more as a character test? Maybe we should make people with elite character by raising them with no family, just a random person who doesn't love them, and sparse food and water? No, that would be bad for their development and they would just turn out fucked up. And all the skills they used to survive in that environment would be useless in the real world.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Sounds utopian. Or am I misunderstanding something? You seem to think the purpose of life is to create a utopia.

While we’re at it, maybe we should force people to become robots and kill those who refuse? These robot bodies don’t feel pain. We’ll have a utopia where nobody is capable of feeling pain.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Heil Bender! Screw you, meatbag!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What lol. This response is so dumb. At what point did I encourage forcing anyone to do anything?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You want to kill people, even though living beings instinctually want to live, for the good of the country. You tell yourself it’s okay because their lives are full of suffering. I just took your premise to the full conclusion.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's not possible to "turn people into robots incapable of feeling pain" so your argument doesn't work.

And we kill living beings all the time out of necessity for food or because they're pests, or even just for fun.

If they're not wanted and they're more than likely going to be a detriment to society anyway, I think it's good to abort them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So individuals should only exist for the good of society? They have no value outside it?

Why do you think the elites are injecting graphene oxide in everyone?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I did not say that, but the health of the society must be considered, and I think everyone on this website can agree that the health of society is pretty fucked rn.

An actually good method of birth control would be the best thing we could do, but all options kinda suck. Best things we have are condoms and Plan B. Neither are super convenient or failsafe. And no one wants to physically sterilize themselves because of the possibilities.

I've not seen any proof that graphene oxide is in the COVID vaccines. And the obsession with Pfizer is so strange. Moderna gave out just as many, but there's no conspiracies about them.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you know it was a Black woman doctor named Mildred Jefferson who convinced Ronald Reagan to become pro-life?

Thank you for admitting that abortion is not just murder, it is genocide by whites against people of color.