Texas Pastor Caught with 'BDSM' and Bestiality-Themed Child Pornography

submitted by ActuallyNot from lawandcrime.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

The trans agenda absolutely does target children, which is why they want it taught in pre-schools.

But by "target" you mean wear a big colourful dress and over-the-top makeup and read them stories.

This pastor wanted to watch them being sexually abused, including by animals.

There's no equivalence. The former is a fun and educational time. The latter is life-destroying abuse.

And they're teaching them that everyone is trans and that gender is determined by personality and cis people are just bigots, not that it's an extreme problem affecting less than a percent of the population.

Are they? How are they getting the "cis people are just bigots" part across to pre-schoolers?

One of these is the LGBT community, because it exists for no other reason than to virtue signal about being a minority, and it's been co-opted by the deep state for the purposes of social engineering.

It's got to be better than the christian social engineering of raping kids and filming them being fucked by dogs.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

They say anyone who thinks gender identity isn't real and gender is biological is a bigot. By that logic all cis people are transphobes for not having a gender identity. All transsexuals are transphobes for having body dysphoria. All egalitarians are transphobes for not bowing down to gender roles.

We know that many people have a crossdressing fetish. Doesn't it make sense then why people who like to sexualize children would push this? All this teaches them is sexism. It's an incredible burden to have to think about gender, so why do we want to place that on the shoulders of completely normal people who otherwise wouldn't have to? There's nothing fun or educational about that.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

They say anyone who thinks gender identity isn't real and gender is biological is a bigot.

For instance?

We know that many people have a crossdressing fetish. Doesn't it make sense then why people who like to sexualize children would push this?

No, it doesn't. I'm not aware of any psychological link between cross dressing fetishes and children.

It's an incredible burden to have to think about gender,

Is it though?

Compared to being filmed being fucked by a dog when you're two, for instance?

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

You're not making any sense. Pedophiles are going to want to see children engaged in their own kinks. By itself that probably doesn't matter, but the fact that they have so much institutional power means we're only one step away from accepting child rape.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

You're not making any sense.

I'm asking for an example of "them" saying that "anyone who thinks gender identity isn't real and gender is biological is a bigot."

Pedophiles are going to want to see children engaged in their own kinks.

Okay. But your claim seems to be that people who have a cross-dressing fetish also like to sexualize children. I don't think that's the case. I think that christian pastors tend to want to sexualize children, but I suspect the causality is in the other direction: People who want to sexualize children become pastors, to get access to them.

Cross dressing, on the other hand, is unrelated.

By itself that probably doesn't matter, but the fact that they have so much institutional power means we're only one step away from accepting child rape.

For instance?

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

No, people who both have a crossdressing fetish and want to sexualize children push it on children.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Who are those people?

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

How am I supposed to know?

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

So there are no such people that you know of?

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

I see them in the media, and it's just common sense that they exist. But I don't know any myself.