Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

submitted by [deleted] from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Yeah but, where do you think Oxford is?

Demanding answers to questions while never doing the courtesy of addressing what is asked of you.

I'm sorry if I neglected to answer one of your questions. Which one didn't I address?

[–][deleted]  (11 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    I do try to answer questions that people put to me in these sorts of forums if I think the question is genuine.

    Maybe you're mistaking me for someone else.

    Yes, you said that I linked to a paper that you claimed was disingenuous because you claimed that it was written by the Oxford Vaccine Group. Nothing in my post was from that part of the world, so I do wonder how you came to think it was from the Oxford Vaccine Group.

    Do you think they're attached to a university in the new World?

    [–][deleted]  (9 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

      You seem upset, I'm okay with that.

      You're calling me insincere which is wrong. And you're calling me time wasting, when I have provided those two papers from my own googling to you for free.

      Perhaps you realise that you were incorrect about the source of them, and you're not the sort of person who says "I was mistaken about that, that criticism I raised is invalid". Or perhaps you know that your criticism was invalid, but you raised it anyway because you've got an interest in spreading misinformation.

      I'm okay with not knowing, to be honest. Neither redeems you.

      [–][deleted]  (7 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

        Again you're still upset.

        I hope that you realise why at some point.

        I told you are a disingenuous piece of shit.

        Oh the irony.

        Your comment was that the papers I linked to were from the Oxford Vaccine Group.

        You are sticking to this lie, and appear to be throwing insults in order to take the thread away from your dishonesty.

        [–][deleted]  (5 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

          You’re still here? Are you getting paid or just an obsessive?

          Your last two comments at least were that you're not going to continue this conversation.

          So this question seems a little ironic. I'm not getting paid. Perhaps I'm obsessive.

          Why are you still here?

          Now stop putting words in my mouth

          Why don't you try then.

          You claimed in your "insightful" post that:

          Oh look a study from Oxford the creators of the "rare" blood clot causing Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 "vaccine"!

          The author affiliations of the paper in the post you reply to are:

          1) Health Outcomes, Policy, and Evidence Synthesis (HOPES) Group, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut, USA (2 Authors)
          2) Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru Centro de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Oncología y Radioterapia, San Isidro, Lima, Peru
          3) Cello Health, Yardley, Pennsylvania, USA
          4) Unidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis, Guías de Práctica Clínica y Evaluaciones de Tecnologías Sanitarias (URSIGET), Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, La Molina, Lima, Peru
          and
          5) Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

          You will have noticed by now, that none of those are the Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

          So, in your own words, were you mistaken or disingenuous when you made that post?
          And now, having been asked about it about a dozen times, and not retracting your misinformation, are you being disingenuous or merely too egotistical to be able to face your errors honestly?

          [–][deleted]  (3 children)

          [deleted]