Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

submitted by [deleted] from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (17 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

    Which article do you think is from the Oxford Vaccine Group?

    The article in the Horse care magazine, overseen by a board of the American Association of Equine Veterinarians?

    Or the paper with the lead and corresponding authors from University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, USA, and none of the authors from the Oxford Vaccine Group ... nor Oxford ... nor England ... nor the United Kingdom ... nor Europe?

    Edit: OMFSM, someone voted your comment "insightful". FFS.

    [–][deleted]  (15 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

      Look at you editing your comment to show your intellectual outrage over internet points.

      If that's what you'd like to look at. You certainly didn't look at my links before writing your comment.

      Why is every leftist propagandist on this site a haughty miserable chapped asshole?

      That's cognitive dissonance. You're feeling uncomfortable because you're defending a wrong position with stuff you know to be false. You think you're irritated at the source of the truth because you're irritated when it's there. But this is projecting. You're irritated at yourself.

      Yes by all means keep posting narrative garbage

      Okay, the question you failed to respond to again:

      Which article do you think is from the Oxford Vaccine Group, the horse care one from America, or the scholarly paper from the Americas?

      This raises a further question:

      Where do you think Oxford is?

      [–][deleted]  (13 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

        Yeah but, where do you think Oxford is?

        Demanding answers to questions while never doing the courtesy of addressing what is asked of you.

        I'm sorry if I neglected to answer one of your questions. Which one didn't I address?

        [–][deleted]  (11 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

          I do try to answer questions that people put to me in these sorts of forums if I think the question is genuine.

          Maybe you're mistaking me for someone else.

          Yes, you said that I linked to a paper that you claimed was disingenuous because you claimed that it was written by the Oxford Vaccine Group. Nothing in my post was from that part of the world, so I do wonder how you came to think it was from the Oxford Vaccine Group.

          Do you think they're attached to a university in the new World?

          [–][deleted]  (9 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

            You seem upset, I'm okay with that.

            You're calling me insincere which is wrong. And you're calling me time wasting, when I have provided those two papers from my own googling to you for free.

            Perhaps you realise that you were incorrect about the source of them, and you're not the sort of person who says "I was mistaken about that, that criticism I raised is invalid". Or perhaps you know that your criticism was invalid, but you raised it anyway because you've got an interest in spreading misinformation.

            I'm okay with not knowing, to be honest. Neither redeems you.