His name was J a s o n C a r s w e l l.. He was cast into the desert for 7 days and nights..

submitted by [deleted] from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NodeThis is my flair. There are many like it, but this one is mine. 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Don't forget that British military troll farm we read about recently, and same here in the US. Our military is actually hiring troll contractors to seek out and terrorize conservative White people.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Yes - though they are interested in much more than "conservative" White people. They have legitimate international targets, even if recently they had to go after the gravy seals who wanted to kill and harm people in the Capitol Buiding. These aren't Isenhower Conservatives. They're Radical Republicans, some of whom believe that terrorism is OK for their their specific causes.

[–]NodeThis is my flair. There are many like it, but this one is mine. 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they had to go after the gravy seals who wanted to kill and harm people in the Capitol Buiding.

This is a leftist narrative that's falling apart. Those were literally Trump normies...

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"They have legitimate international targets...." Who told you that? The government commits crimes every day. Is that OK? Why should people follow corrupted power structures, Socks?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes - I should not use the word 'legitimate' in this context, for the reasons you mention. Since the 16th century, the US has caused numerous international conflicts - I recall something like 150 of CIA-led, or unofficial, and official. The official list is here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_armed_conflicts_involving_the_United_States

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Thank you, sir. Edit: although, you never answered my question about corrupted power structures and the reason we should follow them?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I see - indeed I did not answer that. The answer is an emphatic, 'no'. Like some on Saidit, I think we should challenge the corrupt power structures, eg. D.C. lobbyists &c. My view is that this is part of late stage capitalism, and that the main culptrits since Reagan have been the 1% (esp. boomers, closing the door on the next generation), who have been especially supported by the radical republicans. I appreciate that many on Saidit will see much of this differently, hence I argue with users regularly. But there is a general concern about the corrupt power structures.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A general concern does nothing to protect anything. If you have a general concern for a rabid dog in your house, you still have a rabid dog in your house. People like you are going to watch an Empire unveil itself, and you'll either be disgusted with yourselves for taking part in it, or you'll wisen up.

[–]NodeThis is my flair. There are many like it, but this one is mine. 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

https://www.lawofficer.com/doj-quietly-acknowledges-there-was-no-sedition-at-the-us-capitol

Seriously, you need to start ignoring that leftist propaganda. It will give you a false perception of reality

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

By reading right-wing propaganda that the DOJ focused on sedition (whereas they focused on assault charges instead of sedition charges, which are difficult to argue in most cases)?:

https://saidit.net/s/news/comments/7np3/doj_quietly_acknowledges_there_was_no_sedition_at/st0o

[–]NodeThis is my flair. There are many like it, but this one is mine. 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

By reading right-wing propaganda

Just being to the right of Mao doesn't make everything 'right wing'.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not to beat a dead horse, but regarding your link, and the the comments in the link I provide:

https://www.lawofficer.com/ [...] betrays the law officers at the Capitol Building by posting this misleading note about the DOJ, which are not concerned with sedition. They're concerned with assault, some of which directed at security officers. Editors at lawofficer.com should be ashamed of themselves.

I could be wrong, but lawofficer.com does not appear to be right of Mao. (Moreover, China is more of an oligarchy than a communist country. The workers are not reallly sharing the wealth of the industry.)