all 33 comments

[–]ReeferMadness 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (23 children)

The internet is effectively censored in western countries by the woke cabal. (((Google, amazon,facebook,twitter,MSM))) And their co conspirators like (((Mastercard,paypal,ISPs))).

Break them up!!!

This is what tyranny looks like.

[–][deleted]  (22 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

    Is what I said wrong in any way? Why do you object to me calling out the fact that all these tyrannical corporations are owned by Jews? I'm sure it's just a coincidence.

    [–]SharpTomorrow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

    They are also owned by men? I'm sure it's just a coincidence? You see my point. People like you surely make "the white race" look like the dumbest race on the planet if Jays can really manipulate them that easily? You get my point?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

    The people who (((run))) things are using the Jays as a liability shield precisely because of their in-group preference. It is wrong to blame the group as a whole, but the correlation exists nonetheless.

    [–]SharpTomorrow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

    Keep blaming the jays means that you have no agency as a white person. It says more about you than the jays. Maybe you should do something with your life.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

    I didn't blame anyone. You implied that yourself. Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

    [–]SharpTomorrow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

    Yes you did blame the jays, otherwise you wouldn't be obsessed with them thinking they own every single bit tech corporation (which is false to begin with).

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

    I'm sorry about your current situation. Hope you get better soon.

    [–]SharpTomorrow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

    I'm fine, you on the other hand, need a good cure for your racism.

    [–]ReeferMadness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    which is false to begin with).

    It's literally not though.

    [–]SharpTomorrow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It is literally false. All those "jewish" indian CEO and Microsoft or Google /s

    [–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    In a world where until 100 years ago only men were allowed to work. Where we can show a dozen real factors that lead to this. Where the over representation of 50% of the population is several orders of mag itude less than that of jews in media, social media, and any sector of information control. Yet still it is perfectly acceptable to bring it up. Not only acceptable, but required. It is not called sexist to say that men are over represented, it is sexist to say it aut to be that way or to challenge any effort of force it to change. There are literally laws for the sole purpose of lowering the discrepancy. Perhaps we need laws to lower the absurd disproportional power jews have over our society.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    This is what I got, Menopause or pregnant: What are the signs?

    I'm guessing your search is returning a lot of BBC? Might be time to switch search engines.

    [–]Comatoast 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

    Mine was just a lot of Shutterstock images of white women smiling, white women with black men, and then a mixed-race black woman. The link results were all criticisms about Google's search results having racial biases, etc.

    Google is dogshit. I can't find most research articles easily anymore, I can't find most of the shit that I was looking for under well worded search queries anymore, and Google Scholar has been adulterated with sites trying to sell dick pills. Duckduckgo is also poo gas, as is Bing. I didn't even mention Yahoo, because it's on par with geocities at this point.

    [–]NiceDickBro 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Agree - I’m now at a point where I’m having to cycle through 3 different search engines to get what I’m looking for but also because I don’t trust Google isn’t trying to bullshit me with their results.

    Looking forward to seeing what Brave comes up with as I know they’re working on one.

    [–]rubberbiscuit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I've done a ton of research on this as I hate google. Started using gigablast.com which works like the original google, though still has some limitations and 1 of about 5 searches don't come out right for some reason. But it is certainly better than google and I like it. Second choice for me is swisscows.com

    [–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Thank you, I'll look those up.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Bing is surprisingly good for porn searches.

    And also surprisingly, Yahoo has a strong financial section.

    [–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Possibly, but I don't care about either of those things. I just want to research.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    That's why I figure they exist though, they have their niches. Google I'm not so sure except people are just used to it. You calling it dog shit probably isn't fair to dog shit because dog shit is kinda useful sometimes.

    [–]SpongySpiderLegs 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I did ... and all the images were white women who were alone (no husband) and no children.

    I wonder if this means anything ...

    For my next trick, i will google search “happy white men” and look at the result.

    Strange. A bunch of pictures if white men without wives or children.

    Wonder what all this means. If anything.