USA: Donald Trump plans to drop charges against whistleblower Edward Snowden

submitted by Tkayla from inthelatest.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (11 children)

Bravo, the 9 day old coward, blocked me for no good reason so he/she/it/they won't see this.

Snowden is a limited hangout - he revealed NOTHING new, and Glenn Greenwald just handed over all the documents to his Intercept billionaire publisher with less than 10% of the leaks published. Further, Snowden does not condemn Greenwald nor the Intercept for dragging their feet, AND Snowden won't criticize the "official" narrative of 9/11 much less discuss the NDAA 2012 allowing domestic propaganda and psyops in the USA.

[–]BeerBaron 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

he revealed NOTHING new

Can you point me to the document that proved the 5-eyes spying operation prior to Snowden's leaks? And I mean actual links, not just the typical "I'm not here to google shit for you" bullshit. 'Cause if you can't put up, then please, just shut the fuck up.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Can you point me to the document that proved the 5-eyes spying operation

the 5-eyes spying operation

5-eyes spying operation

Bruh, Five Eyes isn't a "spying operation", it's just an intelligence sharing program between five different countries (Australia, Canada, UK, United States, New Zealand), and it's an evolution of the old ACGU (Australia, Canada, Great Britain, United States) program, which has been around for a long time.

There is nothing to "prove", because the existence of ACGU, and then Five Eyes, wasn't actually classified.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

AND Israel, the never mentioned 6th eye. That's why I included it in my /s/Surveillance banner.

You call it intelligence sharing but it's all deep state, shadow government, trade craft, aka, spy craft. Same diff.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A third time...?

[–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Dude, don't get so bent out of shape over getting blocked by someone. And yes, Snowden revealed lots of new info. We already suspected that we the people were being spied on, but the Snowden leaks confirmed it and gave specifics.

Further, Snowden does not condemn Greenwald nor the Intercept for dragging their feet

Wait, a minute ago you said there was nothing new in the leaks. So why would it matter if they took their time if there was nothing new in them anyways? I guess we'll just have to disagree on this point and move on. Snowden said in interviews that he gave the information to them so that they could just choose to release the information that they thought was important, but that wouldn't damage legitimate government intelligence operations. Of course he wouldn't criticize anyone for "dragging their feet", because he wanted them to go through it and only release what was important and not damaging to legitimate operations.

AND Snowden won't criticize the "official" narrative of 9/11 much less discuss the NDAA 2012 allowing domestic propaganda and psyops in the USA.

Maybe because that isn't his wheelhouse? Snowden was an NSA employee that knew the government was illegally spying on its own citizens. Unless he had privileged information about the "truth" of 9/11, why would he comment on it? Same with the 2012 NDAA.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I was striking two issues in one comment. Non-blocked people can repeat what I said to the blocker who may or may not change their mind. When I reply I do it for the benefit of the other user AND always for the lurking audience.

What new info did Snowden reveal?

The whole story is a lie. That's why it matters. If he had this so-called new classified information, then where the hell is it and why are they delaying?

Snowden has never, much less aimed, to "damage legitimate government intelligence operations". This makes him a strawman pretending to be a rebellious hero. He's still working for the government, even if he has to deny it.

Fuck the wheelhouse. It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to notice that the 9/11 story is bullshit.

You are defending a spy. A "traitorous" one at that. Worst of all: he's a propped up poser.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

There is nothing to add to this, bro.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

LOL, except a couple punctuation tweaks.

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Glenn Greenwald just handed over all the documents to his Intercept billionaire publisher with less than 10% of the leaks published

Do you have a source on this? I remember reading it was 3%.

AND Snowden won't criticize the "official" narrative of 9/11

More specifically, he stated on Joe Rogan that 9/11 was made possible because the spy agencies weren't sharing their data with each other, because they were competing for the honour of stopping the attacks and the government funds that come along with it. It isn't as damning as what Julian Assange said (and nothing compared to what Noam Chomsky said, obviously), but still: an intelligence insider like him should know that the failure to intercept three different airplanes on a single day doesn't just happen, it requires the highest echelons of the government to be compromised. (This is regardless of how many planes were actually used in the attacks; Snowden's the one who's sticking to the official narrative so it's curious that he isn't questioning this.)

Edit: owait, you mentioned this elsewhere in this thread.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't recall a specific source. It's general knowledge. I think you're right that it's more like 3%. I was generous.

Further, there was no shortage of people who were trying to warn about 9/11.

Greenwald, and everyone for that matter, is an idiot who doesn't understand that there were MANY COORDINATED FAILURES on the highest levels on 9/11 that are so far beyond mere "happy" coincidence that denial of them implies complicit cover-up.

That's why 9/11 is one of the best litmus tests.

[–]Entropick 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

comment of the thread, right here. it's so crushingly relevant, it needs blocked rather than considered.