you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Lets start by ending globalism, you go straight for the end goal, and you will just destroy the system. Hint, our food supply and livelyhood relies on the systems in place. True idealism takes decades to implement, burning down your own society only allows for greater corruption.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

This has been a hard lesson for angry truth-seekers to come around to. It took me a long time to see it, and I still want to refute it. Only because I think there is a major numbers problem here. Too many ignorant people are following the words of evil, intelligent people. The good, intelligent people do not have the same power base. I feel like we need to thin the numbers a bit if there is to be a good fighting chance at generational fixes. Right now, there are too many ignorant people who could be pulled away from the generational fixes because its easier to do something else.

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

From what I can see, you can manipulate intelligent people as easily as you can manipulate the masses. Not only is intelligence rated in different manners, and cover different aspects of knowledge, it also can mask a lack of overall thinking skills, which is not the same thing.

I could go into some detail on how recollection works, and the importance of belief systems. Yet the short quick rule of thumb is people need to question everything. Look for connections, decide on what the actual outcomes are.

Cares act, Heroes act, heals act. Huge quagmires of false fronts. Yet what are people doing to stop these things? Nothing, they are taking money from BLM and Soros to further these goals of corporate socialism control.

Could socialized finances work? Sure, but as usual, not like this. What's happening is just another round or corruption claiming the ends justify the means. And they rarely do, and never at this scale. This is just destruction and chaos, with the sole purpose of masking earlier corruptions.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I only meant that I think there aren't enough people following your line of thought. There are too many people caught up in all the different ideologies to gather them together to fix one problem. In the old days, if I were a clan leader, I could get other clan leaders together and enact change. Nowadays, you have to work with so many different opposing groups that I just don't think it will work. It's the right path to take, its careful and logical. There is no reason to burn everything down when dismantling it gives you a bunch of recycled material. Burning it all down is like throwing the baby out with the bath water. You and I may disagree on the likelihood of ending globalism, but we agree by stating that that is step number one. I just don't see it happening. It's much more likely that humanity will continue down this path, destroy itself through war or neglect (we can avoid major damage from natural disasters if we pooled our military money there) then rebuild itself from smaller numbers.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My apologies, sometimes I go on tangents about things I feel are important. Which aren't as much the means of doing things, as they are ways of perceiving them. So if it seems my comments were somewhat detached from your comments, there is a good chance they were.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do the same! It's all good. At least we didn't fall to pieces calling each other names ;)