Study: Electric cars losing value twice as fast as gas vehicles – Survey: Growing portion of US shoppers are rejecting EVs

submitted by [deleted] from climatedepot.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Davethe_blank_ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

you need to GTFO with your propaganda. CO2 is .04% of the atmosphere. Water vapor does all the heat trapping that CO2 does and more. The temp records show that temp rise precedes CO2 rises, showing that raised temps brought the CO2, not the CO2 causing the temp rise. So you are dead wrong with every word you type.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you need to GTFO with your propaganda.

It's not rocket science, mate. Greenhouse gases cause the greenhouse effect.

CO2 is .04% of the atmosphere.

By volume, yes. 0.042%, and rising.

Or about 0.064% by mass.

Which is about 3.3 trillion tonnes of CO2, or about 6.5kg over every square metre of the planet.

(1.3 pounds per square foot, for those yet to learn metric)

Water vapor does all the heat trapping that CO2 does and more.

Water vapor is an important feedback. A warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor on average, magnifying the warming.

But it doesn't change the climate of itself. The residency time in the atmosphere is about a week and a half. Stick a whole lot of water vapor in the atmosphere, and you don't melt Greenland. You get rain at some point in the following 10 or so days.

The temp records show that temp rise precedes CO2 rises, showing that raised temps brought the CO2, not the CO2 causing the temp rise.

You're confusing the change from glaciation to interglacial of the glaciation cycles and the current warning. (And you appear to have misunderstood those).

The current warming is CO2 first.

It was already rising by 1750: https://www.climate.gov/media/14596

But temperatures didn't hit a minimum until about 1910: http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/notes/chap15/global_temp.html

(For the start of the interglacials, the CO2 starts moving slightly first, but the increase in CO2 and temperature is mostly simultaneous).

So you are dead wrong with every word you type.

Oh, the irony.