There are no moderate democrats.

submitted by Canbot from files.catbox.moe

all 33 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[removed]

    [–]niggerjewfaggot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    I always thought of your username, and your comments, as a reference to your micropenis.

    [–]MuskyIndependent 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Socks likes gender transitioning children.

    [–]niggerjewfaggot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Starting with sproketboy

    [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Do not advocate violence on saidit.

    [–]BISH 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    Become a national but not a citizen, and they can't take your children. Period.

    [–]Canbot[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

    Get an arsenal and a community willing to die beside you and they can't take your children. Short of that you're fucked.

    [–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    Federal law in this area is necessary for the protection of children from medical abuse at the hands of trans apologists.

    Short of that, the only effective solution is to leave the state entirely.

    The world is larger than America and there are many places where such things aren't so widely tolerated. The current social and economic decline of the US doesn't seem to have any end in sight imho apart from the inevitable slide into authoritarianism which is hilariously something both the left and right agree on while finger pointing at each other.

    Course there's another somewhat novel idea in that the red blue split very much benefits the ruling class. You have in the red states your so called "breeder class" who turn out kids and work manual labor. Then you have in the blue states the Eunuch class who manage the more managerial and paperwork affairs of the society for the kind of soul crushing corporate positions that require some degree of education yet can be steeped in enough double think and the lack of familial ties that they are easily manipulated towards the goals of the ruling class and won't be able to band together along common lines that could threaten the current position of such ruling class.

    It's all talked about in Goldstein's book the Principals of Collective Olegarchism.

    One thing Orwell got wrong though is the kind of drab and boring asthetics of the inner party. The boring samely blue jumpsuits and the like. It's much more effective to stick rainbows everywhere and promote outrageous fashion choices as they keep the Eunuch class far more preoccupied with themselves rather than their overall position in the machine.

    [–]Ehhhhhh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Federal law?!

    What idiot would double down and ask govt to pass more laws to protect their rights at this point?

    [–]Alienhunter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Unless there is an overarching authority that outright says that it's not OK to take kids away from their parents to make them Eunuchs, then there will be lesser authorities that will do so. This is the unfortunate issue with power once we reach this point. The alternative is to cede the issue the other way at the federal level which will otherwise precludr the ability to move to a state that does not have such an unjustly evil law on their books, unless you wish to move to China or Saudia Arabia or some other country that doesn't buy into the woke mind virus, which might be a good option despite the disadvantages.

    I think the government has a responsibility to protect the weak and the innocent and such an "overreach" is well within their purview. I would absolutely support a federal law that prohibited transitioning children against their parents wishes, this is not an issue where it's wise to leave the decision to the purview of state governments.

    We cannot put the genie back into the bottle when it comes to overreach of government power and the wielding of authority at a level where it is inappropriate. The only way to correct such overreach is by using the power itself to stop it. It's a purely Darwinian concept. It may be for the greater good of all if everyone works together and shares power equally, but that is simply not how the universe works. The strong will dominate the weak whether the weak are principled or not. It is therefore better to wield power for good against evil rather than to forgo using power to make some kind of damn fool idealistic statement on how things are "supposed to be" right before you get trampled by "how things are".

    The choice towards American society today is not one of Authoritarianism vs Small Government. That choice has already been made, the move towards authoritarianism is certain and the progression in that direction cannot be halted. The choice is whether the authoritarian state demands your children become eunuchs or rather the authoritarian state forbids it.

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    That's idiotic.

    Basically trying to say that because we can't limit the govt from taking our kids we might as well hand them our kids.

    [–]Alienhunter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    You are opposed to a federal law that says that children cannot be taken from their parents if the parents do not agree to a gender transition?

    I fail to see why.

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    In current times, creating new laws is never the answer. They trigger people to "beg" for laws and then slip in what they really want.

    Creating a law to allow federal govt to overrule states laws should be watched very close.

    Our rights should already cover our children anyways and their new law should be overruled by Supreme Court without additional laws being passed.

    [–]Alienhunter 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I think that is a pretty naive position. What would be the constitutional basis by which you would toss out this law?

    I would agree that you need to be suspicious of anyone in the federal government. But I fail to see issue with a federal law that specifically says "No government agency may seek to remove children from their parents for the reason of the parents not accepting a child's gender identity which is not congruent with their biological sex" could be abused.

    If you have any examples or ideas of why such a law would be a bad idea I am happy to discuss that.

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Naive? And you're the one trusting that they have the capacity to write a simple, accurately targeted law?

    [–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Based.

    [–]Alphix 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    THIS is the way.

    [–]hfxB0oyAPirate Party 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    This gay knows whassup.

    [–]niggerjewfaggot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    You're a fascist pig, Canbot

    The problem with most Democrats is that they ARE moderates

    Need to fight fascists with equally radical approaches, but Democrats can't be bothered and many of them partially agreee with some of the right wing approaches (though not fascism)

    The other problem is that the 'radical right' have taken the rest of the right with it. There are no moderate GOP, not at the voting booth.

    [–]Canbot[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    What is a fascist?

    [–]sproketboy 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    u/niggerjewfaggot is one.

    [–]Canbot[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    It's a good bet considering he can't define it.

    [–]niggerjewfaggot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    well well - long time no see - you stupid fuck

    great to see that I've inspired you to return from Hades

    [–]chadwickofwv 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    How about you goose step your way back to reddit where your brethren reside?

    [–]ShoahKahn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The "left" are forever involute to fascism, because the communistic model demand that all submit to a singular ideology. What was once an economic argument -- having failed, due to every communist economic system failing (China's being economic capitalism + societal communism) -- has now, in desperation, turned to identity, gender, biology, and even the fundamental sciences. The upside-down newspeak of "prosperity through penurity", has shifted to "black is white", "he is she", "male is female", and "science is religion".

    [–]passionflounderIndependent 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    There are times that call for deep reflection and introspection, and there are times that require we act decisively and with focus... then there are times that call for excessive drinking. We are at that threshold.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    based

    [–]Ehhhhhh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Whatever. Do you not see the pattern in pushing extremist views and then trying to use that to represent the moderates in order to destroy identity and push division?

    [–]Canbot[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I don't know any moderate liberals. They all support this.

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    No they don't. You're just pushing division and obviously don't have many friends or connections.

    [–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    MAGA! LET'S GO BRANDON! TRUMP! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! AMERICA FIRST. DON'T TAKE MY CHILD!

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

      [–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Gay guy calling out democrats for passing extremist legislation.