you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (49 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Canbot 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    It is not free speech that allows jews the power to subvert society like this. It is the jews ability to deny speech to thier opposition.

    All it would take to stop them is the ability to reach the masses with logical explanations, sufficiently long enough to break the brainwashing. That can't be done because there are not enough protections from Jewish censorship.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 9 fun4 insightful - 8 fun5 insightful - 9 fun -  (20 children)

        Free speech has been nothing but destructive to humanity.

        Found the Reddit mod

        [–][deleted]  (18 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

          engaging in various forms of degeneracy

          i think its more degenerate to stifle thought and expression. its also incredibly dumb. try to get that tiny brain working on that.

          [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

          speech, thoughts, expressions, ok keep them free. But outlaw degenerate acts like actually becoming a tranny.

          [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

          speech, thoughts, expressions, ok keep them free. But outlaw degenerate acts like actually becoming a tranny.

          outlaw degenerate acts. as usual, you have the dumbest take on this. i dont get this recent push for trans shit either, but who decides whats 'degenerate'? dumbfucks like you? that is what has gotten us where we are at now. some dudes like wearing womens clothes, who gives a fuck. not all gay/trans people are the morons people see on tv. i wear idiotic tshirts sometimes, is that next on your list hitler?

          [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

          common sense decides what's degenerate. long time traditions and customs. Why are we even debating this.

          [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

          common sense decides what's degenerate. long time traditions and customs. Why are we even debating this.

          LOL!!!

          [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

          based on your name I'm guessing you're from india. Illegal immigration should be outlawed for common sense reasons too, it's like that. Same with outlawing murder, this shit is all common sense. No more allowing children to be mutilated. Common sense.

          [–][deleted]  (6 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            based on your name I'm guessing you're from india.

            based on your stupidity, weve already been through this. i know you cant stand that you dont know what nationality/ethnicity i am, but the fact that you are dumb as fuck to not recognize what my username relates to makes this shit even more hilarious.

            [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            Yes

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            try to get that tiny brain working on that.

            That's the only reason he supports censorship. I bet someone proved him wrong in a debate and crushed his ego.

            [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            Wow

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Let's be honest, you only want "free speech" preserved so that you can continue pretending to be a woman and engaging in various forms of degeneracy.

            And you only want to censor your political opponents, because you know you can't win an argument, and the only people who agree with you are the six self-described neo-Nazis you've only ever talked to over the Internet.

            That's the true motivation behind libertarians.

            Do Libertarians want to ban abortion, shut down the borders, give everyone free healthcare, and raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour?

            Right-wing SJWs are just as entertaining as left-wing SJWs! I wonder if you'll have a mental break-down like Horux did — snow-flakes are so sensitive. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to waste.

            [–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Found the Reddit mod

            got a legit lol out of me

            [–]Flicksener 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (10 children)

            What you're describing is fascism. No thank you. Only the weak and scared advocate for the censorship of speech.

            [–][deleted]  (9 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]Flicksener 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

              And you clearly don't know what Democracy is and what it's brought to the world if you're rallying against freedom of speech. Limiting speech is fascistic. Pretty simple to understand.

              [–][deleted]  (5 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]Flicksener 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

                Democracy doesn't work compared to what? What other forms of government are there that are better?

                Also, is the mostly Democratic West and its massive progress and success in just about every human field imaginable over the last few hundred years not good enough for you? Would you rather live under a Communist Dictatorship like China, or Communist Dictatorship like Russia, or a Monarchist Dictatorship like Thailand, or whatever the hell most countries in Africa are ruled under?

                [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                [deleted]

                  [–]Flicksener 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                  Trade between nations has been going on for thousands of years, not just several hundred. Civilization was partially founded on trade. Yet it's only within the last 200 years or so, since the rise of Democracy in the West, and particularly in America, that we've seen an explosion in human progress.

                  Your monarchy theory is interesting. You're familiar with Thailand being a monarchy and how that's going for them at the moment, yes? How their (unelected) prince is widely despised by many citizens yet still remains in power due to a fine mix of tradition, loyalty, and propaganda as he continues to funnel billions from his country's coffers to himself and his cohorts?

                  In case you're wondering what he looks like, here are a few pictures:

                  https://miro.medium.com/max/3316/1*KXmePRZEz4-6ZzbmsEM3yQ.jpeg

                  He's the one with all the tattoos and wearing what looks like a sports bra. Stylish fella.

                  At least with Democracy, you can (usually) get rid of crappy leaders every four years and replace them with people who may not be as crappy. Not so much with a leader who claims the divine right to rule for as long as he and his family wishes.

                  [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                  [deleted]

                    [–]Flicksener 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    Do absolute monarchies even exist these days? And I believe Thailand's monarchy was for show until the recent guy, who started imposing his will and syphoning money from the government, money which belongs to his family, granted, in much the same way the British royals own a great deal of property the British government uses under the agreement that they'll be taken care of with few to no obligations so long as they don't start attempting to impose their will upon legislation. I believe the reason for the outrage around the Thai prince is because 1) he's broken an unspoken rule and begun imposing his will on the government and 2) he dresses like a cheap hooker and behaves in an otherwise unbecoming manner for someone who is supposed to be "divinely ordained." He apparently held a ceremony some years ago where one of his wives or girlfriends was made to be topless throughout, which didn't go over well with the populace. I haven't looked into this stuff in detail, honestly. It all sounds quite wacky.

                    I don't disagree with you about how Democracy is run currently, especially in the US, but, again compared to just about every other system of governance we have, it's an improvement. Unfortunately the only way to truly be above any of this stuff is and likely always will be to be wealthy. Otherwise, you're just a servant subject to the whims of those above you. Democracy and Capitalism at least open that door to people who otherwise never would have had that opportunity.

                    [–]tyranicaloverlord 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                    The fuck are you going on about?

                    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

                    Preach on! Sieg Heil! :-)

                    [–]milkmender11 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

                    I don't think overweight neckbeards quite make the cut for 'master race' but you do you

                    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                    Low IQ post is low IQ.

                    [–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

                    Obese BMI is obese.

                    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                    No, actually, I had an "Obese BMI" when my abs were clearly visible, back before I GOT POISONED.

                    Get yourself lethal levels of mercury, lead, cadmium and arsenic and come back to me with how great a shape you're in. Let's talk then.

                    [–]milkmender11 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                    Geez I thought we were just trolling I didn't realize you were actually taking all this so personally. Relax man it's just some ribbing on the internet. Not worth blowing a gasket over. peace

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    Fuck off and eat shit.

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                    Okay, LARPer.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                    Whatever, demented nutcase.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    My memory is quite terrible, and I would describe myself as an eccentric — so yes, that label would suffice.

                    [–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    Free speech has been nothing but destructive to humanity.

                    how have i missed this genius on saidit? your previous posts are...something!

                    Faggots shouldn't be allowed to have pride parades to normalize their degeneracy.

                    i dont think ANYONE should be allowed to have parades. theyre fucking stupid.

                    If your speech is harmful to public morals then it needs to be censored for the sake of a harmonious and orderly society.

                    preach it sister hitler!

                    [–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                    I wouldn't toss Speech Freedom out altogether. The problem is that nothing is true in an undelimited, pluperfect, cosmos-spanning frame. Everything, be it "free" or "speech", exists between a set of boundaries beyond which their meanings become ambiguous and incoherent.

                    The occupants of Western nations no longer approach cardinal concepts with similar framing. At one point, the things which the LGBT movement now imposes on the culture were not in the frame of "speech". They were included within their own frame of "obscenity". "Free Speech" meant political speech. Reasoned speech. Obscenity was not entitled to protection.

                    This is now inverted: Obscenity is the only absolutely protected "speech". Dissenting political speech is curtailed and hidden behind paper sleeves, blackened windows and euphemisms.

                    The discursive space of the transition from one understanding of "Free Speech" to the other involved a stinking marshland of questionable political speech in which "speech" and "freedom" were dragged out of their frames, their frames demolished. I can understand how this supports the case that Free Speech is a flawed principle. It's not. Free Speech did not twist itself out of place. Nor was it twisted out of place by those native to the culture which conceived it. The people who inverted Free Speech did so out of malice. They need to go.

                    [–]literalotherkin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    This is now inverted: Obscenity is the only absolutely protected "speech". Dissenting political speech is curtailed and hidden behind paper sleeves, blackened windows and euphemisms.

                    Great point. I don't think it's a coincidence either that there appears to be direct connection between the rise of liberty for obscene speech and the decline of liberty for reasoned speech about issues like politics and social matters. I think it's sort of a drug people get hooked on that appears to present you with liberty but is actually a trap. Today we can basically see what would be considered nearly hardcore pornography in the 70's on a television show meant for general consumption but we actually can't debate serious issues at all without gnashing of teeth, charges of various 'isms' and 'phobias' and potential career and social destruction.

                    I don't think those two phenomenon are a coincidence.