all 18 comments

[–]jamesK_3rd 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

This wasn't about Biden. This was about me, and about anyone who has more traditional, conservative or libertarian leanings and anyone who thinks differently.

Donald Trump is a scumbag. Donald Trump largely said things people like me think, but he never followed up on any of it or did so only in administrative action instead of forcing RINO Republicans to make a choice. Donald Trump was largely a democrat under the guise of what is now a GOP shell which is largely talking points from W. Clinton era Democrats.

But to the media, and to progressives/Democrats, Donald Trump is the proxy for me and for us, as much as that pains me to say and although he really isn't. They hate him, because they hate us. All those people with "we believe.." or "love Trump's hate" signs in their yard, they hate me. And they'll be the first to call the cops and have your children taken from you for not vaccinating, masking, denying climate catastrophes.. Even though the BLM hordes are at their white picket fence looking to burn their house down.

However many people voted for biden or didn't, covid has left everyone's idols and the truth out in the open. The amount of people still traveling in their car or running outdoors alone while wearing a mask is astonishing. It's almost April one year later. The amount of people who actively detest freedom is larger than all the fake vote tallies for Biden. So you see Biden isn't The cause, he's a symptom. They don't care about Biden, they care about you, if you don't worship their atheistic cult gods with them. But you know, wear a damn mask.

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

This was about me,

Right. Are you sure you're not a liberal? Joe Biden delivered a speech That nobody watched, and you think this thread is about you? Go practice sucking your own dick please.

[–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

you think this thread is about you?

Read paragraphs 2, 3, and 4.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

"Read paragraphs 2, 3, and 4. "

I did. I would not describe those as paragraphs.

[–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

a distinct section of a piece of writing, usually dealing with a single theme and indicated by a new line, indentation, or numbering.

A paragraph is a self-contained unit of discourse in writing dealing with a particular point or idea. A paragraph consists of one or more sentences. Though not required by the syntax of any language, paragraphs are usually an expected part of formal writing, used to organize longer prose.

They do appear to meet the requirements to be considered paragraphs. But the original point is that there's no indication or reason for thinking he believes "this thread is about you". Where is that coming from?

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

"They do appear to meet the requirements to be considered paragraphs. But the original point is that there's no indication or reason for thinking he believes "this thread is about you"."

Yes, they are technically paragraphs. But they portray no rational thought. If anything they are emotionally driven, just as most liberal rants are. Look, I won't go over each and every sentence, but allow me the liberty to line item the first 'paragraph' for you.

This wasn't about Biden.

What does he mean by "This"?

"This was about me,

Again, what is "this" and why is it about him? I know one thing for certain now. This IS about him.

"and about anyone who has more traditional, conservative or libertarian leanings and anyone who thinks differently."

OK... So... In addition to being about him, this is about people who are traditional, conservative, or libertarian leaning, and most importantly, anyone who thinks differently. Now that last category doesn't define a bases for comparison, so it literally means everyone. Because everyone thinks differently. Or to correctly rewrite the first paragraph.

"This effects everyone."

Again... Whatever "This" is... It effects him, you me, others... Whatever. So, can't build on that. Goes nowhere after the intro paragraph... But do you know what I know for sure??? What he made clear to me?

This part here, that shall enable me to address your Question, with an answer. The Question being, where did I get the idea, that OP, thought this was about him?

"This wasn't about Biden. This was about me"

I got it from there. The piece that I quoted originally, that you replied to, to ask me:

"Where is that coming from?"

From my very first reply, where I quoted him directly. 😐

What do you want from me?

[–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Again, what is "this" and why is it about him?

Remember your initial claim I responded to was that "this thread is about you". He's not referring to this thread, post, or saidit. The meaning of 'this' I immediately saw in the first reading was "all of this" we've been seeing and experiencing for this past period of time. I might include back to the mid 60s. Others might pick a smaller subset of 'this'. But the 'this' is essentially the war on whites, conservatives, and our current civilization in general.

This was about me, and about anyone who has more traditional, conservative or libertarian leanings and anyone who thinks differently.

Not him specifically, him as a representative of the categories he cites later in the sentence. (even if 'thinks differently' could be reworked into a more specific category)

What do you want from me?

Maybe some more detailed replies like this? But for right now, to read more into what he was 'attempting' to say in that comment. Or, maybe I just read too much into it after he identified the deal with Trump.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He's written nonsense, and you have filled in the blanks with your own thoughts. This language is the end goal of newspeak. Nothing was communicated, and you replied based on your feelings, and gut reactions.

[–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What country are you from, and what is your first language?

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

From all the chatter over on patriots.win & greatawakening.win last night, I can assure you the only people who were watching him, hate his fucking guts.

[–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Have you read the rules on those sites? They literally have a rule against "hate speech"... Seemed like a promising community of sites, until I discovered they're leftist SJWs.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

How about you quote us the rules you take issue with? In the meantime, I will reiterate my actual point. No Biden supporters watched his speech. Only Trump and Q followers watched his speech.

[–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No hate speech.

Something like that, but I deleted the tab and no longer go back there. People prohibiting whatever they label as 'hate speech' are my enemy. And unless you're far more leftist than you're letting on, they're probably your enemy too.

No Biden supporters watched his speech.

There were probably a few. But it's plausible and unfortunate that Trump supporters take jao biaden seriously enough to watch him read the speech his handlers put in front of him.

The Trump gambit worked way too well for the people running things. It sucked all the power out of the right, and paved the way for their great reset.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The Trump gambit worked way too well for the people running things. It sucked all the power out of the right, and paved the way for their great reset.

Which is why they needed to cheat in the election, and get all of the corrupt republicans to illegally ratify the election results? That makes no sense. That makes no sense at all. Like fingering your self as a suspect to prove your innocence. They've had this on lock down for the past 24+ years before Trump, why would they expose themselves like that?

[–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't pretend to know or understand the tactics used by these various entities, but I can guess based on a look at the results they obtain. What do we see in this 'biden takeover' event? The right is more demoralized and powerless than ever before. The left and their puppet masters are free to virtually do whatever they want.

So what did openly cheating like that do for them? It was a slap in the face to conservatives, the right, and anyone who still believed in the constitution and the rule of law. It sent a strong message that the game has changed, and you better stfu and accept the new normal. (this paragraph could be expanded, but that covers the basics)

What explains Trump's role in all this? If you remember the day after the 2016 election, Trump met the press and made clarifying statements on video about his thinking. It's been awhile, so just paraphrasing: "Hillary is my good friend, the Clintons are great people, and no one is getting arrested and going to jail". His "You'd be in jail" was what tipped me over the edge into actually bothering to vote again. It became immediately apparent that Trump was just an extraordinarily skilled bullshitting reality television actor (coincidently my last previous vote) who played his target demographics 'like no one ever had before'.

In the following months and years, his jewish supremacy and ownership by the MIC became openly obvious, and only unseen by the left TDS sufferers who hated him, and the right TDS sufferers who loved him. Trump created a tremendous amount of TDS on a daily basis. Trump was owned, and he played the game all the way to the end. He sucked the supposedly conservative right into his amoral orbit, and destroyed them.

That was the purpose of installing Trump. Look at the results objectively. If one began to examine his life and the behaviors he exhibited before and after taking office, 'there's a lot of material there'. The end result was that he did maximum damage to the conservative right, and paved the way for everything that's happening now.

This could be polished, and tightened up with citations of specific acts and such. Do you know much about the "13 families who own the world"? You never hear about them in the media they own, but I tend to believe reaching that position would require some sophisticated smarts, and would give one an extraordinary level of control over world events. Maybe I'm just a sucker for coincidence theories, but there's some odd stuff happening out there.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't pretend to know or understand the tactics used by these various entities, but I can guess based on a look at the results they obtain.

The first half of your sentence contradicts not only your entire reply. But the second half the the sentence it is in. I won't debate anything you have to say, if you can't even get through a single sentence without contradicting yourself.

[–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's no contradiction there. But it's probably best to not continue if you think there is.

[–]FuriousPatriot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

10,000 down votes. 4000 upvotes. Most popular president of all time. Somethings fishy.