Because She Did Such a Bang-Up Job With the Border: Chlamydia Harris to Lead Regime’s New Unconstitutional Anti-Second Amendment Rights Office

submitted by boston_blackie from thereload.com

all 15 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Hematomato 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, that's definitely a pre-election-year kind of move. They create a committee to do something they know they can't do, just so they can use it as a talking point in debates. And then, come 2025, we'll never hear about that committee again.

Your tax dollars at work.

[–]GuyWhite 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Last presidential election, we didn’t hear shit about gun control from the Demonrats. Because they knew that was a loosing issue. Gotta wonder why they are bringing it up now heading into another election? Is someone going senile?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

We still don't hear shit about gun control from the pervert Repoopli-tards either. Because they know it's a losing issue for them. And they don't care that it's their own grandkids who are going to be gunned down by the next idiot male mass killer who thinks they know how to change the world with a gun because their own penis is too small and they're very sad about their own loser life.

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dems have no actual issues to push for. All of their long standing policies were implemented with this administration and they were all proven a huge disaster, not to mention unpopular in the real world. Biden forgot that those policies were meant to be bait to garner low info new voters, and not actually implemented. The public support for them were all a Cybil attack of propaganda, hoping making it look already popular, so would get some really people to follow.

This is why they bring out commu-social-ist Bernie sanders at the beginning of every election, then quickly put him back in the closet before the election starts. His Vanguard talk is like heroin to low info college freshmen and the Internet propaganda addicted of the over-worked working class, with no capacity for deeper understanding of the issues. You are just supposed to remember to not actually do those dumb childish virtue signaling things after it garners you an election win, so you can re-use those positions again later.

The only policies the Democrats have left after these fake pie-in-the-sky positions, is they same old no-real-answer gap-fill issue, where they are stuck with the opposite position of their rivals:

  • abortion - when does killing unborn babies become legal, necessary, reasonable, or hip and trendy, and no longer the legal and personal responsibility of the mother.
  • nanny-state pre-crime/safety - we are all much safer to ourselves and others if disarmed and caged in a concrete box from birth.
  • excess spending - special interest cash handouts to buy electoral support, just ensure it is a virtuous cause and that the money is wasted so that cause can be re-used later.

[–]turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I hope she is equaly effective with this initiative as she has been on the border.

Uzis for everyone!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yes Kamala Harris has been AMAZINGLY successful with her border initiatives and I'm glad there's someone else here on this forum who agrees. Kamala Harris for President is now available as a bumper sticker and a T-shirt and I'm also giving them out as posters to interested business partners. I'm glad that you are on board!!

[–]turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You do realize I was being sarcastic right? I honestly can't tell if you are kidding here or not tbh. I have never heard anyone claim Kamala was doing well with the border and she is not even in the conversation as a potential candidate for prez as everyone including the DNC know that she is unelectable at this point.

I doubt you actually have Kamala for prez gear but if you do what "interested business partners" are you looking to give them to? Aren't you suppose to give them to voters who support her?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I don't give a good god-damned fuck if you were being sarcastic or not. And I really don't give a good goddamn fuck about your "doubts" or your replies or anything else. To me, you're just another ignorant ill-mannered fuckwad and about as useful as a dead maggot filled rodent. And by your own admission you are an uneducated, blind, stupid, retard. You can shove your opinion up your crusty asshole for all I care.

[–]turtlew0rk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Wow

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks! :)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It's "Kamala" Harris, your sorry attempt to demean her by misspelling her name only makes you seem like a complete and utter moron. She's much better educated, much more well-adjusted, and much more powerful than a nitwit dimbulb like you could ever hope to be. In fact, YOU are the one with the "clhlamydia" brain, as you've amply demonstrated. I for one am helping fund Kamala's campaign for presidency, and it's very likely she'll win on the strength of our monetary contributions alone.

[–]boston_blackie[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I just posted the article - I didn't write it. But on the rest of the toxin you spewed, Im sure you're correct on all charges. Coexist!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm well aware that you didn't write the article. But if you're going to post toxic sludge, you're going to get a faceful of toxicity back in return. And I'm just getting started.

[–]boston_blackie[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Go back to Reddit

[–]thomastheglassexpert 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I understand the feds reporting then just ban any dimmo or black from any type of gun or ammo and more that 90% of mass shooters have no weapons. Of course that won’t happen. I was a prohibited possessor for more that 25 years and had zero problem getting both handguns and long guns and ammo. Easy really when cash laid down.