Genius study suggests that being a fat diesel dyke slob means you probably don't care as much about your looks as a straight chick does.

submitted by hfxB0oyA from psypost.org

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Well, duh

Lesbians aren't attracted to men and don't care about male gaze, so it's obvious that they don't care about being thin and feminine like hetero women does. What's you fucking point? Are you offended by that?

[–]asterias 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Are you offended by scientific research?

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

And look it at it the other way, gay men have to stay thin and young looking yet still macho or they stay lonely.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I got three gay cousins. As far as i can interpret their personal stuff it seems like it doesn't work like that. At least not for all of them.

One of them told me that the "bodily attraction"-thingmajig is totally outside his personal equation when he is "looking".

He is an artist though... And the only one of my cousins that i keep in touch with on a regular basis. Because somehow he is as "weird" as i am. That is what keeps us connected, i believe.

All the artists i know that manage to make a living from their art are somehow "weird" in a very wide sense, once you get to know them, i suppose.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It's also a thing that men will happily go for their lowest 10% in attractiveness for casual sex but want the top 10% for relationships.

For women it's top 10% for both. Likely because they risk pregnancy.

Of course there's no accounting for personal taste.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I suppose this is conclusive.

There is some "new" definition for the way, my personal choosing of a partner e.g. supposedly "works". But then there are the cases of many couples of either orientation or sex i know in person that found their "personal" workaround, so to say. Including myself.

That is how it should be. At least in my simulation this is sound. Beautiful even, if i watch some of these "things" closely without interfering. I love watching this... how couples cope... It feels so purely human...

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not offended at all. My interest is that a full-on research study had to be made to come to a pretty obvious conclusion.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's time you go to s/gendercritical