Genius study suggests that being a fat diesel dyke slob means you probably don't care as much about your looks as a straight chick does.

submitted by hfxB0oyA from psypost.org

all 19 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Some people will do anything they can to tell you there's something wrong with you if you're straight.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. But the drinks are free for whole evenings. That i like. I couldn't make myself jump the cliff of letting one of them suck me off though...

Real hard dilemma that one was. Because he was such a nice human being, i didn't want to hurt his heart without knowing "how much" beforehand, so to say.

I really valued the conversation we had. That sadly has become seldom nowadays in my simulation.

[–]SMCAB 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Best title in a long time. Quality content.

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks!

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah it is pretty funny

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Not to mention that the vast majority of women are attracted to men. So the article may as well have been saying, "being female is a risk factor for an eating disorder."

Whenever mainstream media attempts to summarize a "study," they somehow make the study sound even more dumb than it was to begin with.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Based on the article linked here (not the study itself) It seems they really do mean what their title says, because the study included men too, and they say in that case it's straight men who men had the least eating disorders.

    [–]hfxB0oyA[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    This presumably adult human female gets it.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    😉

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    Well, duh

    Lesbians aren't attracted to men and don't care about male gaze, so it's obvious that they don't care about being thin and feminine like hetero women does. What's you fucking point? Are you offended by that?

    [–]asterias 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Are you offended by scientific research?

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    And look it at it the other way, gay men have to stay thin and young looking yet still macho or they stay lonely.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I got three gay cousins. As far as i can interpret their personal stuff it seems like it doesn't work like that. At least not for all of them.

    One of them told me that the "bodily attraction"-thingmajig is totally outside his personal equation when he is "looking".

    He is an artist though... And the only one of my cousins that i keep in touch with on a regular basis. Because somehow he is as "weird" as i am. That is what keeps us connected, i believe.

    All the artists i know that manage to make a living from their art are somehow "weird" in a very wide sense, once you get to know them, i suppose.

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    It's also a thing that men will happily go for their lowest 10% in attractiveness for casual sex but want the top 10% for relationships.

    For women it's top 10% for both. Likely because they risk pregnancy.

    Of course there's no accounting for personal taste.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I suppose this is conclusive.

    There is some "new" definition for the way, my personal choosing of a partner e.g. supposedly "works". But then there are the cases of many couples of either orientation or sex i know in person that found their "personal" workaround, so to say. Including myself.

    That is how it should be. At least in my simulation this is sound. Beautiful even, if i watch some of these "things" closely without interfering. I love watching this... how couples cope... It feels so purely human...

    [–]hfxB0oyA[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Not offended at all. My interest is that a full-on research study had to be made to come to a pretty obvious conclusion.

    [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    It's time you go to s/gendercritical

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    It used to be that lesbians were considered the sensible ones.

    However while straight women are getting eating disorders lesbians are going on testosterone and having their tits cut off.

    The same self harm problem with different methods.

    [–]Jong56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The level of virtue signaling for a genetically unsustainable lifestyle is astonishing.