Woman on maternity leave asks for pay rise because she wants one, employer refuses so woman sues for 9k and wins. Well done, I might ask for a pay rise now and sue if i don't get it.

submitted by [deleted] from mirror.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

If you ask for a pay raise and are refused for a discriminatory reason, then yeah, you should sue.

[–]package 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

This lazy bitch was asking for a raise that clearly she was planning to coincide with a period during which she would be sitting on her ass collecting free money. Only in a retarded dystopian hellscape like the UK would it be considered discriminatory to tell her to fuck off.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Discrimination against a woman for being pregnant is against the law in most countries, not just the UK.

[–]package 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

It's not discrimination for being pregnant. It's asking for a raise to coincide with paid vacation. The reason for the paid vacation is not relevant.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Maternity leave is not paid vacation. Entirely separate thing.

[–]package 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

It is equivalent to paid vacation in that you are doing something besides working and getting paid to do so. To ask for a raise before any such period is very transparently you attempting to optimize the your compensation for minimal work. It's something a lazy and immoral person does and shows a lack of respect and appreciation for both your employer and the system that is allowing to have paid time off.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

No, it's not. It's equivalent to sick leave, maybe, not it's not paid vacation.

[–]package 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

You can argue semantics all you want but it doesn't chance the obvious intent behind the timing of the request.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

She just returned from maternity leave. When else did you expect her to ask?

[–]package 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

When she's spending more time working than getting impregnated. If you honestly think it is reasonable to get back from maternity leave with another child already on the way and demand a raise before you head back out, for effectively doing absolutely nothing but leeching money from the company for months at a time AND forcing them to hire someone to do the work you're not doing, you are completely beyond help.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Fair, but only if they don't have someone else to support them. That goes for men too.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But they aren't working, so why should they be collecting money?