The still-anonymous coward who murdered unarmed protester Ashlee Babbit has a new excuse: She wore a backpack.

submitted by wristaction from thegatewaypundit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

"Play stupid games; win stupid prizes."

Western democracies are rigged by oligarchs.

Voting is playing along, and is a "stupid game".

Direct nonviolent resistance is the only practical option.

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Western democracies

And despite how awful they are, there has yet to be a better system...

Japan and South Korea are awesome places, but their civil rights and liberties are missing in huge chunks.

China doesn't even pretend to give their citizens rights.

Russia has had the same ruling class for the last 40+ years. Most of them aren't even government officials despite commanding major parts of the country's defense department.

Honestly, what governmental system do suggest that doesn't involve an anarchic-reset in 10 years?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

what governmental system do suggest that doesn't involve an anarchic-reset in 10 years?

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized, or not.
Must tribal villages or frontier farming communities were patriarchical anarchist.

No one from the village or farm is ever arrested. they still have trials for serious crimes (murders, kidnapping, etc.).

The police were literally created from the obsoleted industrialist's goon squads.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

We've been conditioned into thinking we need to be ruled.

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized,

I'm not even going down that road. Had that conversation enough times to spot cognitive dissonance.

village or farm

&

industrialist's goon squads

Okay. Big points that need to be focused on. Given substantial space for self-governance the farm and village example can work for virtually any governmental system. The problem is the scalability of such a system. A large amount of space is required per person and the number of people can't be in the hundreds of thousands.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

It's protection money. We're paying not to get shot. A few hundred years ago you would just move your farm. Problem solved. Now every patch of land, dirt, and rock large enough to stand on, is claimed by a group of people calling themselves a country. There is nowhere left to run except the ocean and us poor people can't afford a boat large enough to grow food on.

In today's world we'd be a fool not to pay someone.

We've been conditioned into thinking we need to be ruled.

Because it stops most of the population from starting their own government. Humans are very dangerous cattle with the potential to become the new owner of the farm if the rancher makes the mistake of letting us know how the game is played.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized,

I'm not even going down that road. Had that conversation enough times to spot cognitive dissonance

/s/AnarchySpeach you must be confused about what anarchy actually is.

Anarchy mean no rulers. No slave masters. That's it.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

It's protection money.

I agree with this. Protection money is a mob/gang strategy to rob the public. Pay us, or bad things will happen to you.
If you don't pay, then they wreck your business, etc.

Humans are very dangerous cattle with the potential to become the new owner of the farm if the rancher makes the mistake of letting us know how the game is played.

Are you human cattle?

Have you already accepted your masters?
Are they paying you to write this?

Had that conversation enough times to spot cognitive dissonance.

Ditto

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Anarchy mean no rulers. No slave masters. That's it.

Anarchy can't support large groups of people crammed into a small space. Other systems replace it through violence very quickly. If the slaves can't escape anywhere to freedom, then anarchy stops being a practical option for a government.

Are you human cattle?

If more people questioned things, like us, there wouldn't be so much suffering in the world. If government could acquire wealth and land without having to bother with people they would've killed everyone already. Keeping the average sheep alive is in inconvenience for them. They do it because they have to. Because it makes them money.

The people on Twitter? They're sheep. Getting told what to do, what to say, getting fed their daily dose of dopamine.

You can't honestly look at those people and see anything less than cattle being ordered around...

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Anarchy can't support large groups of people crammed into a small space.

According to the masters who own the system, and own all of the land.

They seem to manage pretty well without taking orders from others.

They operate with zero accountability, and do great harm to the public.

The people on Twitter? They're sheep. Getting told what to do, what to say, getting fed their daily dose of dopamine.

You can't honestly look at those people and see anything less than cattle being ordered around...

These people are victims of the system that has been created to brainwash, and marginalize them.

State schools, and media propaganda.
Critical thinking had been driven from the minds of the public.

This was all done intentionally.

Then they point at the victims, and claim it's natural.

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not according to them. Because of them.

They seem to manage pretty well without taking orders from others.

Because they have an army to command.

operate with zero accountability, and do great harm to the public.

As long as the majority of sheep don't care the others are being harmed (because of tribalism and sorting ourselves into pre-approved groups) there is no one to hold them accountable.

claim it's natural.

Humans have a natural social instinct to conform to the group. That's natural. Governments and other powerful entities frequently abuse this to fake normalcy around topics to create the illusion of populous consent. I think it's morally wrong, but for many people they willfully choose the illusion over reality despite knowing the truth. It is hard for me to consider them all victims when their internal identities are dependent on the fantasy.

1+2=3

Those who disagree with that are doing so because they want to fit in.

Maybe I'm just heartless, but I don't consider them victims.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You say that and then when it happens, you concoct a conspiracy theory that it was a show put on by crisis actors.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

what governmental system do suggest that doesn't involve an anarchic-reset in 10 years?

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized, or not.
Must tribal villages or frontier farming communities were patriarchical anarchist.

No one from the village or farm is ever arrested. they still have trials for serious crimes (murders, kidnapping, etc.).

The police were literally created from the obsoleted industrialist's goon squads.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

We've been conditioned into thinking we need to be ruled.

Edit: Also, I don't think voting changes anything significant.

The globalist Oligarchy set the agendas.

The politicians are put there, so we can throw rotten tomatoes at them.

Nobody voted for Gates, or Faucci, or Thedros.
These characters are managing an agenda that exceeds the politicians scope of influence.

The politicians know Coco is a hoax. They're employees.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Then they framed the peaceful protestors.

With what?

The protesters inside the Capitol did nothing wrong.

They framed the protesters as protesters?

You claim they fake-murdered an unarmed female protester ... to drive public sympathy away from the protesters?

I understand your motive. Your antipathy towards the right is laden with status insecurity. You're the intelligent, university certified Rick and Morty class intellect and the people who've been driven off of Twitter and reddit are mere factory technicians who believe in dumb shit like family and 2+2=4. In order to reassure yourself that this gulf is wide as the Ganges, you make your disinfo as stupid as possible. If you were to make the effort to construct a plausible disinformation campaign that would credit your marks with too much intelligence. So you hammer out a bunch of "sasquatch shot the crisis actor from a UFO" horseshit, sit back and cackle to yourself that your marks will eat it up.

Have you noticed it isn't working? That the reason you have to spam it so hard in every fucking thread is because everybody sees you glow like plume of swamp gas?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You claim they fake-murdered an unarmed female protester ... to drive public sympathy away from the protesters?

This is exactly what was done. They entered a public building.

Now they're all being prosecuted for a fake unarmed insurrection.