The still-anonymous coward who murdered unarmed protester Ashlee Babbit has a new excuse: She wore a backpack.

submitted by wristaction from thegatewaypundit.com

all 69 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

I thought they reported she didn't die?

I watched the videos numerous times, and it looks like a set up.

Likely another media hoax shooting.

The entire operation was a setup. The cops let them in.

Trump never showed up for his people.

[–]wristaction[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I thought they reported she didn't die?

Get the fuck out of here with that shit.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The entire protest was a setup.

Antifa wearing maga hats, and antifa camera crews, etc. The police let them in.

Babbit has an empty IMDB page.

https://m.imdb.com/name/nm12216390/

Probable crisis actor.

[–]wristaction[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whatever you say, officer.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know what? This whole setup at the Capitol was probably pulled off by the same people who tried to take God out of the schools and put fluoride in the water.

[–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There's a video that purports to show how that whole scene in the hallway was faked. It details all the movements and gestures of those present, and claims it was all faked. Impressive effort, but I still think that guy who had been posting about wanting to kill Whites actually did it.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

but I still think that guy who had been posting about wanting to kill Whites actually did it.

Facts are facts. Sometimes disreputable agents are used to point out the facts. This makes it less likely for opposing sides to recognize the truth.

Your story is more interesting, because the "wanting to kill Whites" source is breaking ranks on this issue.

Do you recall the source?

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was a 'dig' on the background of the shooter, including social media posts. Not very useful to not save links to all this stuff, I know. Even if I did, the originals are probably deleted and it could be called a fake.

But essentially, the shooter was a burn loot murder supporter, and had posted about wanting to "take out some of those people". It seemed to reference White Trump supporters.

The link I saw was probably on https://poal.co/all/hot in the first half of January.

[–]wristaction[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

By the way, the anonymous officer - who is not being named, whose name hasn't "leaked", whose identity and background is not being sought in the name of public interest by the national news media and who is not expected to be prosecuted for aiming his gun at an unarmed, 110lb protester, firing and killing her - is clearly lying. He cannot claim to have seen her backpack and not seen the officers standing directly behind her.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He cannot claim to have seen her backpack and not seen the officers standing directly behind her.

Hoax shootings are a licence for Police to claim whatever they want. They can change their story at any time.

The state will pay millions in civil damages against fraudulent claims with public tax money.

And the family will get paid tens of thousands from go fund me scams.

The entire charade is beyond absurd.
People may storm buildings if they have an objective.
There was no objective. The police let them enter.
It's a public building. What was the fake barricaded doors nonsense; as if there's a protected inner sanctum?

The narrative is beyond retarded.

[–]Nemacolin 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (33 children)

Well, she was attacking the Capitol too.

[–]jet199 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

Funny how every other county round the world has had protesters invade it's parliament at some point and I've never once seen it called "attacking."

Americans are all about the drama.

[–]bjam27 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

In most counties it's illegal to protest ANYWHERE besides the Seat of Govt. This asshole Nema defends fascism but is too dumb to learn about a single other county and believes the gaslighting.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It might be illegal but it very much still happens and no one claims its a coup.

In the UK when they wanted to ban protest on Parliament Square the main argument was that it looked untidy not that it was anti democratic, because that's the complete opposite of the truth.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No comparison between state capitol posers who stood in the building doing selfies, and the terrorists who broke into the capitol building, some of whom wanted to kill two or three people, according to their comments. It wasn't drama or about drama. They said they were taking back their house. Just watch the videos. Fuck those assholes.

[–]bjam27 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Gaslighting lies.

Protesting the govt at the seat of govt goes back to the first ever political protest.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It wasn't drama or about drama. They said they were taking back their house. Just watch the videos. Fuck those assholes.

It was 100% drama.

some of whom wanted to kill two or three people, according to their comments.

Including the scripted narrative that you were kind enough to point out.

Another color revolution PsyOp to villanize a section of the voting public.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those QBoogaloo shitheads were following the advice of Trump, Giuliani, and others to storm the capitol and stop the steal. It's that simple. They weren't capable of sophisticated PsyOp - whatever you want to tall it.

[–]HiddenFox 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Canada's parliament was attacked. I was called an attack.

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/canadian-parliament-attacked-soldier-killed-gunman-msna441466

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So not a protest then.

[–]bjam27 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Unarmed protestors asking the govt for a fair election at the seat of govt. Literally the only way many countries are allowed to protest.

You defend Govt murder.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

"Play stupid games; win stupid prizes."

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

"Play stupid games; win stupid prizes."

Western democracies are rigged by oligarchs.

Voting is playing along, and is a "stupid game".

Direct nonviolent resistance is the only practical option.

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Western democracies

And despite how awful they are, there has yet to be a better system...

Japan and South Korea are awesome places, but their civil rights and liberties are missing in huge chunks.

China doesn't even pretend to give their citizens rights.

Russia has had the same ruling class for the last 40+ years. Most of them aren't even government officials despite commanding major parts of the country's defense department.

Honestly, what governmental system do suggest that doesn't involve an anarchic-reset in 10 years?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

what governmental system do suggest that doesn't involve an anarchic-reset in 10 years?

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized, or not.
Must tribal villages or frontier farming communities were patriarchical anarchist.

No one from the village or farm is ever arrested. they still have trials for serious crimes (murders, kidnapping, etc.).

The police were literally created from the obsoleted industrialist's goon squads.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

We've been conditioned into thinking we need to be ruled.

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized,

I'm not even going down that road. Had that conversation enough times to spot cognitive dissonance.

village or farm

&

industrialist's goon squads

Okay. Big points that need to be focused on. Given substantial space for self-governance the farm and village example can work for virtually any governmental system. The problem is the scalability of such a system. A large amount of space is required per person and the number of people can't be in the hundreds of thousands.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

It's protection money. We're paying not to get shot. A few hundred years ago you would just move your farm. Problem solved. Now every patch of land, dirt, and rock large enough to stand on, is claimed by a group of people calling themselves a country. There is nowhere left to run except the ocean and us poor people can't afford a boat large enough to grow food on.

In today's world we'd be a fool not to pay someone.

We've been conditioned into thinking we need to be ruled.

Because it stops most of the population from starting their own government. Humans are very dangerous cattle with the potential to become the new owner of the farm if the rancher makes the mistake of letting us know how the game is played.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized,

I'm not even going down that road. Had that conversation enough times to spot cognitive dissonance

/s/AnarchySpeach you must be confused about what anarchy actually is.

Anarchy mean no rulers. No slave masters. That's it.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

It's protection money.

I agree with this. Protection money is a mob/gang strategy to rob the public. Pay us, or bad things will happen to you.
If you don't pay, then they wreck your business, etc.

Humans are very dangerous cattle with the potential to become the new owner of the farm if the rancher makes the mistake of letting us know how the game is played.

Are you human cattle?

Have you already accepted your masters?
Are they paying you to write this?

Had that conversation enough times to spot cognitive dissonance.

Ditto

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Anarchy mean no rulers. No slave masters. That's it.

Anarchy can't support large groups of people crammed into a small space. Other systems replace it through violence very quickly. If the slaves can't escape anywhere to freedom, then anarchy stops being a practical option for a government.

Are you human cattle?

If more people questioned things, like us, there wouldn't be so much suffering in the world. If government could acquire wealth and land without having to bother with people they would've killed everyone already. Keeping the average sheep alive is in inconvenience for them. They do it because they have to. Because it makes them money.

The people on Twitter? They're sheep. Getting told what to do, what to say, getting fed their daily dose of dopamine.

You can't honestly look at those people and see anything less than cattle being ordered around...

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Anarchy can't support large groups of people crammed into a small space.

According to the masters who own the system, and own all of the land.

They seem to manage pretty well without taking orders from others.

They operate with zero accountability, and do great harm to the public.

The people on Twitter? They're sheep. Getting told what to do, what to say, getting fed their daily dose of dopamine.

You can't honestly look at those people and see anything less than cattle being ordered around...

These people are victims of the system that has been created to brainwash, and marginalize them.

State schools, and media propaganda.
Critical thinking had been driven from the minds of the public.

This was all done intentionally.

Then they point at the victims, and claim it's natural.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You say that and then when it happens, you concoct a conspiracy theory that it was a show put on by crisis actors.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

what governmental system do suggest that doesn't involve an anarchic-reset in 10 years?

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized, or not.
Must tribal villages or frontier farming communities were patriarchical anarchist.

No one from the village or farm is ever arrested. they still have trials for serious crimes (murders, kidnapping, etc.).

The police were literally created from the obsoleted industrialist's goon squads.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

We've been conditioned into thinking we need to be ruled.

Edit: Also, I don't think voting changes anything significant.

The globalist Oligarchy set the agendas.

The politicians are put there, so we can throw rotten tomatoes at them.

Nobody voted for Gates, or Faucci, or Thedros.
These characters are managing an agenda that exceeds the politicians scope of influence.

The politicians know Coco is a hoax. They're employees.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Then they framed the peaceful protestors.

With what?

The protesters inside the Capitol did nothing wrong.

They framed the protesters as protesters?

You claim they fake-murdered an unarmed female protester ... to drive public sympathy away from the protesters?

I understand your motive. Your antipathy towards the right is laden with status insecurity. You're the intelligent, university certified Rick and Morty class intellect and the people who've been driven off of Twitter and reddit are mere factory technicians who believe in dumb shit like family and 2+2=4. In order to reassure yourself that this gulf is wide as the Ganges, you make your disinfo as stupid as possible. If you were to make the effort to construct a plausible disinformation campaign that would credit your marks with too much intelligence. So you hammer out a bunch of "sasquatch shot the crisis actor from a UFO" horseshit, sit back and cackle to yourself that your marks will eat it up.

Have you noticed it isn't working? That the reason you have to spam it so hard in every fucking thread is because everybody sees you glow like plume of swamp gas?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You claim they fake-murdered an unarmed female protester ... to drive public sympathy away from the protesters?

This is exactly what was done. They entered a public building.

Now they're all being prosecuted for a fake unarmed insurrection.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like those two FIBs who got drilled through the door last month.

[–]jamesK_3rd 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Seemed like a mostly peaceful protest..

How many illegal firearms were confiscated there again?? I think someone testified recently it was a really low number...

Pro tip: if you're insurrectioning without firearms, you're insurrectioning wrong.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pro tip: if you're insurrectioning without firearms, you're insurrectioning wrong.

Sagely advice. +3

[–]wristaction[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

An unarmed, 110lb woman.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

An unarmed, 110lb woman.

She was closer to 130.

Also, plenty of people around her had firearms. The guy next to her had an AR.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yep - seems odd that someone would expect to jump into an area where there were congresspeople a moment before, and where a guard is pointing a gun (that she didn't see, I suppose), and have military experience, and not expect to potentially get shot. The backpack issue is irrelevant.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Like when you're marching in the street and you're too fat to dodge a car.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

False equivalence, and potentially in favor of murderers. Congrats, you're now on an FBI dangerous subversives list.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Really no equivalence at all. One was a fit, 14-year Air Force vet, independent businesswoman and patriot engaged in a legitimate protest. Heyer was an obese commie whose only purpose in marching up the street in an illegal assembly was to violently suppress others' right to political expression.

[–]fred_red_beans 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Everything Wrong With Ashli Babbit Shooting - a Hollywood Stunt

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are they still anonymous? That's a miracle. You'd think somebody on 4Chan would've figured it out by now.

[–]wristaction[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They did. He's an affirmative action hire named David Bailey.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

You know what you guys ought to do? Get on over to the web sites that are publishing the photos of the attack. Join in the effort to put a name to each person there. Then you can get the name of the #StillAnonymousCoward.

Start here:

https://old.reddit.com/r/CapitolConsequences/

https://twitter.com/hashtag/SeditionHunters?src=hashtag_click

https://jan6evidence.com/#/e?latitude=38.8899389&longitude=-77.0090505&zoom=14

[–]wristaction[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

His name is David Bailey.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Cool. Tell us more.

[–]wristaction[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

He was an affirmative action hire with a phys ed cert.

If he were a homosexual with a BA he might've gotten in at the FBI.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I await some reliable report you have the right person. A person of that name surely was with the Capitol Police a few years ago. He was decorated for valor having been wounded protecting the United States. Other than that, nothing pops up.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The coward deleted his socials.

Why not just ask him?

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You should do that.

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't have law enforcement resources. You do it.

You want to see a murderous cop brought to justice, don't you? I mean, there's no reason Chauvin should be on trial while Bailey goes free.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nothing wrong with a trial if there was a crime. If the shooter was this guy. But of course we must use all the tools to ensure we do not make a mistake. As of now, I have not seen any indication you have the right guy.

[–]wristaction[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, I guess that'll just have to stick in your craw until something develops.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Why not ask your enlisted subordinates?

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I have no enlisted subordinates. I am an old retired Infantry officer. Now I am working in Saudi Arabia for four more weeks. I am not even allowed to carry a gun!

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Now I understand why you suck so much establishment dick. It was literally indoctrinated into you. Man, poor Nema. Learned how to fight, but didn't learn how to defend himself.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Gosh, you really know a lot.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Golly, you know you aren't supposed to like all that Army butt-sex, right?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I am an old retired Infantry officer.

You're a retired officer, who used to work in the infantry?

Working in civil affairs (military PsyOps) now, eh?

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I work in the oil & gas industry.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mmmkay.

[–]crazedchef90395 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Was convinced before, now 100% that this was FF and all involved were crisis actors. This shows what the news never did.

Nothing makes sense until you realize it is all an act.

https://leakedreality.com/video/1776/everything-wrong-with-the-capitol-shooting-in-21-minutes-or-less

[–]wristaction[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Stop spamming this disinfo.

[–]crazedchef90395 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Suck an egg. This was such an obvious set up from the beginning. YOU are probably a disinfo agent. Don't care, but YOU do not get to tell me what to do. In the immortal words of Rage: Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me.