you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Anarchy isn't chaos. It could be organized,

I'm not even going down that road. Had that conversation enough times to spot cognitive dissonance

/s/AnarchySpeach you must be confused about what anarchy actually is.

Anarchy mean no rulers. No slave masters. That's it.

We've been fooled into paying for our own oppressors.

It's protection money.

I agree with this. Protection money is a mob/gang strategy to rob the public. Pay us, or bad things will happen to you.
If you don't pay, then they wreck your business, etc.

Humans are very dangerous cattle with the potential to become the new owner of the farm if the rancher makes the mistake of letting us know how the game is played.

Are you human cattle?

Have you already accepted your masters?
Are they paying you to write this?

Had that conversation enough times to spot cognitive dissonance.

Ditto

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Anarchy mean no rulers. No slave masters. That's it.

Anarchy can't support large groups of people crammed into a small space. Other systems replace it through violence very quickly. If the slaves can't escape anywhere to freedom, then anarchy stops being a practical option for a government.

Are you human cattle?

If more people questioned things, like us, there wouldn't be so much suffering in the world. If government could acquire wealth and land without having to bother with people they would've killed everyone already. Keeping the average sheep alive is in inconvenience for them. They do it because they have to. Because it makes them money.

The people on Twitter? They're sheep. Getting told what to do, what to say, getting fed their daily dose of dopamine.

You can't honestly look at those people and see anything less than cattle being ordered around...

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Anarchy can't support large groups of people crammed into a small space.

According to the masters who own the system, and own all of the land.

They seem to manage pretty well without taking orders from others.

They operate with zero accountability, and do great harm to the public.

The people on Twitter? They're sheep. Getting told what to do, what to say, getting fed their daily dose of dopamine.

You can't honestly look at those people and see anything less than cattle being ordered around...

These people are victims of the system that has been created to brainwash, and marginalize them.

State schools, and media propaganda.
Critical thinking had been driven from the minds of the public.

This was all done intentionally.

Then they point at the victims, and claim it's natural.

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not according to them. Because of them.

They seem to manage pretty well without taking orders from others.

Because they have an army to command.

operate with zero accountability, and do great harm to the public.

As long as the majority of sheep don't care the others are being harmed (because of tribalism and sorting ourselves into pre-approved groups) there is no one to hold them accountable.

claim it's natural.

Humans have a natural social instinct to conform to the group. That's natural. Governments and other powerful entities frequently abuse this to fake normalcy around topics to create the illusion of populous consent. I think it's morally wrong, but for many people they willfully choose the illusion over reality despite knowing the truth. It is hard for me to consider them all victims when their internal identities are dependent on the fantasy.

1+2=3

Those who disagree with that are doing so because they want to fit in.

Maybe I'm just heartless, but I don't consider them victims.